Hell, for Democrats, it doesn't even have to be the real Jeffrey Epstein to be blamed for the being connected to Jeffrey Epstein :
Posted on 11/22/2025 3:21:48 AM PST by TigerClaws
Jeffries denies it, and that’ll be good enough for the legacy media... and then they’ll get back to making up stuff to connect Trump to Epstein.
Btw, for the screaming “Jew hater” crowd you should maybe ratchet down your screams unless you want to scream it at Bibi too
As Megyn Kelly pointed out..maybe you can’t trust Barak when he says Epstein had no intelligence connection
And nothing will be done or can be.
wy69
The Epstein issue is a huge Dem FAFO.
It all depends on the meaning of the word “nothing”.
Many prominent people (whose names you may never had heard of) are about to be booted from the Boards of Directors of corporations large and small, country clubs, social clubs, civic and charitable organizations, political organizations etc etc etc.
It may be “nothing” to you but it will be the biggest event of their lives.
It’s not all Democrats although they have the
majority of liars....the BS comes from both sides.
True.....but given the opportunity, we have
to blame Democrats as much as possible
In related New Jersey news, Robert Menendez and his wife did nothing wrong, Robert Torricelli was wrongly accused, Daniel Van Pelt was a sweetheart, John Lynch din-do-nuffin, Robert Janiszewski was never taking bribes, Alfred Steele never read those contracts, Wayne Bryant was just a kind dentist, Milton Milan just loved beaches elsewhere, William Musto, wife, and his head of staff (Robert Menendez) were saints.
Damn Dog, don’t stop now!
“Many prominent people (whose names you may never had heard of) are about to be booted from the Boards of Directors of corporations large and small, country clubs, social clubs, civic and charitable organizations, political organizations etc etc etc.”
Have you ever heard of any influential people not finding comparable or better positions after they decide they need a change? And it isn’t unusual for some to just say “so what” and continue their current positions. People like Clinton, Obama, and Biden to name three have not changed their lifestyles or decreased their income after being named in numerous situations like the one in the thread. Others include:
Marion Barry: After being caught on videotape smoking crack and serving a prison sentence, he was elected mayor of Washington D.C. again in 1994.
Newt Gingrich: He resigned as Speaker of the House in disgrace in 1998, partly due to his affair with a congressional staffer. He later ran an unsuccessful bid for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012 but is now considered an elder party statesman and media figure.
Mark Sanford: He admitted in 2009 that he had lied about “hiking the Appalachian Trail” to cover for a trip to see his mistress in Argentina. Despite the heavy criticism, he later successfully won an election for an open seat in the U.S. House of Representatives.
David Vitter: He admitted his involvement in the “D.C. Madam” prostitution scandal in 2007, but was re-elected to the Senate three years later.
There’s more. These people are interchangeable and move from position to position on a regular basis. They won’t be out of touch for long.
wy69
Hell, for Democrats, it doesn't even have to be the real Jeffrey Epstein to be blamed for the being connected to Jeffrey Epstein :
It is true—some will recover and even prosper.
Some will commit suicide.
Every person and situation is different.
Goebbels defense.
“Hakeem Epstein Jeffries”
I like it! It has a nice ring to it. Hakeem’s “people” will especially like the Jewish touch.
The Big question I needs to ax is whether or not Hakeem spent the night when he went to Epsteins house for Dinner ?
It was a thing for Epstein to have dinner guest stay over!
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu caused a stir——he recently shared a “Jacobin” article about Jeffrey Epstein’s work for his hated rival.......former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak. For more information, visit Times of Israel.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has publicly questioned US intelligence community’s connections and activities on multiple occasions in various contexts, including in relation to Jeffrey Epstein and the US security failure during a presidential rally.
Specific instances include Jeffrey Epstein: Greene has speculated whether Jeffrey Epstein was working for Israeli intelligence, a question she raised in interviews while pushing for the release of all files related to the investigations into Epstein.
During a House Oversight Committee hearing in July 2024, Greene questioned the Secret Service director, Kimberly Cheatle, about the assassination attempt on Donald Trump.
Greene suggested there might have been a “conspiracy” or “security failure” that was “allowed to happen,” implying potential involvement or negligence by the agency, a claim which the director denied.
She has accused fellow Rep. Eric Swalwell of having a sexual relationship with a suspected Chinese spy, Fang Fang, in a House Homeland Security Committee hearing, thus questioning his national security connections and fitness for office.
More generally, Greene has a history of questioning official narratives surrounding events like the 9/11 attacks and school shootings, framing her comments as “just asking questions”.
She has expressed regret for some of these past comments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.