You appreciate discussions that have theories presented as fact ?
The point was the question presented itself in more than one forum within school. Biology class, and to a certain extent Astronomy elective. (Big Bang theory.) — As well as a class that fulfilled Religion requirement for the year. Could be “Bible” or “Philosophy” class…Depending on the year.
(“World Religions” also presented different takes on creation. And actually one proof that the Noah flood is THE flood is because a grand flood narrative presents itself in the lore of multiple ancient cultures)
The 6 day Genesis was read, mined, presented, plus Darwinism, Big Bang, etc…Catholic Church teaching, readings/documents which also were not monolithic! But lean on “Theistic Evolution” and nuanced with distinctions between macro vs. micro evolution etc.
And we were allowed to present, discuss, and come to our own conclusions.
I didn’t see your other question
/
Oh really, you didn’t notice the bright red
notification ?
I don’t believe you Hun.
/
until after I posted the long answer and included you in the reply box since you posted the original topic.
/
The original topic had zero to do with your windy worded slam on fundamentalists or the other posters reply or questions asked
But you knew that.
So, do you appreciate discussions where theory is presented as fact in schools ?
And please, enough of your wordy dissertations , just a concise yes or no will do.
And please refrain from your habitual prevarication.
My guess is you won’t , cuz you’re basically academic uberweasel
No offense meant, just an observation.