“a new reading of the Constitution which promotes “legal strictures, possibly experienced at first as coercive” that ultimately “encourage subjects to form more authentic desires for the individual and common goods, better habits, and beliefs that better track and promote communal well-being.””
The article is too long and wordy. Just a lot of communist collectivist authoritarian sophistry.
They're going for the world record.
The article is too long and wordy. Just a lot of communist collectivist authoritarian sophistry.
__________
It’s just a rambling piece of work about various theories of jurisprudence that are not new and doesn’t really change a thing. Judges who stray afield of originalism defeat the very basis for law’s existence. The same holds true for God’s Word in the Bible from which much of our law derives.