"...In theory, the Insurrection Act should be used only in a crisis that is truly beyond the capacity of civilian authorities to manage. However, the Insurrection Act fails to adequately define or limit when it may be used and instead gives the president significant power to decide when and where to deploy U.S. military forces domestically..."
I read this and thought: "What is the difference between 'beyond the capacity of civilian authorities to manage' and 'beyond the refusal of the civilian authorities to manage'..."
To me, this is closer to a state initiated secession because they REFUSE to address the situation.
This is akin to the stupid characterization of the invasion by illegals as a "Border Crisis". That was never a crisis. It was a deliberate process by the Democrats to BREAK the existing law and decriminalize that law. Leftists like that jack-off Pritzger WANT this violence.
Yes, it appears that they’re intentionally provoking civil violence.
2020 was the closest these Marxists came to their utopian dream of absolute power.
Rather than voluntarily surrender their vile agenda and advocate policies agreeable to American voters, they made the conscious decision to abandon their voters and import foreigners that they could manipulate into voting for them.
What they did was the very definition of treason, and every one of them should be taken into custody and charged with facilitating an illegal invasion of the US.
No bail, as every one of them is a flight risk.
Biden, Mayorkis, Garland, the whole lot, no exceptions.