The Martyr of Murder, Himself Wants to Quash Communication—"Shut Up, You Can’t Talk"
President Kennedy made a famous remark about freedom of thought and speech which will end this note. The people who use the Charlie Kirk as an object of hatred, probably, mostly know near to nothing about the opinions and issues he talked about, and listened to, and himself learned from, with people of a wide variety of viewpoints. I don’t know most of what he said, either, but I do know that the Jimmy Kimmels are polluting the air with nonsense, which people will ultimately see through once they work through it, nonsense that secretly is aimed at quashing debate and free thought flow. (So I think it was a bad mistake to fire Kimmel, because no one was listening to him anyway, so let him rave on with his pathetic, irrelevant outbursts.)
To accurately see a thing, a set of issues and circumstances, even if you don’t have to wear glasses, you still need to attain a specific vantage point and focus; for even with 2020 vision, the eyes themselves are still optical instruments that work best for their purpose—seeing—in a definite way.
Opposition to seeing and talking about actual reality, was what the cultural communist propagandist and spy Herbert Marcuse formalized as partisan “Repressive Tolerance”. You already know all about this, you’ve seen it in hundreds of instances over many decades: Only a certain viewpoint is allowed, they’ll get modern storm troopers like Antifa not only to shout down any discourse but to bloody the heads of people who just want to talk.
Marcuse temporarily arresting the attention of young people— many of whom discovered his lies and achieved clearer thinking through open discussion
The most disabled thinking and feeling people, have been systematically, not accidentally, abused by ruthless systems designed to exploit them for evil purposes. (Isn’t “evil” a rather strong word? Evil disguises itself, with the help of “educational” conditioning that makes many people regard it as a “not nice” thing to look that evil in the face.)
Take the most violent single political group, transsexuals. I know about them because of I have grandchildren who are locked into it, and who make death threats.
Their radicalization proceeds in several distinct phases: First, they were molested, something that was once much rarer, though never entirely absent, but that is now a tsunami.
Then they were groomed within the schools—in a counselor’s office there was prominently displayed, an autobiographical drawing of a naked woman showing her private girl parts.
Then as was shown with the Minnesota School-Church shooter, just several weeks ago, the last stage before violence is having been doped and chopped up by “doctors” for money, which makes their rage permanent.
All this is predicated on neglect and isolation—if they were abused by family or teachers, the first thing is to ensure their isolation—"if you tell anyone, I’ll hurt your puppy or little sister or brother". The evil, evil people know they can only operate in secret, by getting the victims alone.
It is the quashing of free communication that Kimmel and all the other murder martyrs have been taught to promote.
President John F. Kennedy focused in on the essential issue, real freedom of thought and speech which murder-martyr Kimmel really opposes:
We seek a free flow of information across national boundaries and oceans, across iron curtains and stone walls. We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.
We won’t permanently prevail in opposing the murder-martyrs by suppressing them. The pendulum will swing back the other way. Don’t forget how strong was the control held by the evil-lovers just 5 years ago, from Antifa’s free summer of rampage, to the Fed setup of January 6, 2021.
They will be back. The lies are only dormant. It takes courage and listening to other points of view, to be able to communicate that portion of the truth that you have.