“Emissions” means CO2. Not primary pollutants like sulfur, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter.
Just when the USA just might be on the brink of killing the ridiculous “Endangerment Finding” that determine the clear, odorless, inert CO2 is a pollutant.
The article keeps repeating the lie that EVs are “zero emissions.” Such utter BS.
CO2 emissions are GOOD for trees. And the Left wants to refuse such admission. If you’re driving in rural roads, you want the CO2 emissions for the trees and your plants. Extra CO2 for plants mean better chances for your vegetables to grow.
The entire article is bullshit on steroids, with a bath salt chaser, including “the”, “and”, “of” etc. Pathetic.
Agreed. When I meet fellow EV owners and they thank me for saving the world or whatever, I always tell them that they’d freak if they knew how much real pollution went into making the EV, versus other things making CO2 which is plant food. But I don’t hate trees so I don’t hate CO2, unlike the Warmageddon doomsday cult following other EV owners who keep falling for the lie that the world is going to end in 10 years, this time they mean it.