Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the (Australian) government wants to tell you what car to buy
Speedcafe ^ | September 19, 2025 | Jordan Mulach

Posted on 09/20/2025 5:42:05 PM PDT by WhiteHatBobby0701

The Australian Government’s 2035 emissions target is ambitious, and the vehicles we buy are included in the pathway.

Earlier this week the Federal Government announced it had set a national target to reduce overall emissions by 62 to 70 per cent (compared to 2005 levels) by 2035, something it called “ambitious, achievable, and in Australia’s national interests”.

Spearheaded by the Climate Change Authority, the 2035 Targets Advice is the most aggressive planned reduction in emissions ever seen in Australia, and of course vehicles have their role to play.

According to the CCA, to help meet this target approximately 85 per cent of all light vehicle sales – which excludes trucks etc. – will be electric by 2035, compared with 75 per cent of commercial vehicles.

The 2023 Targets Advice report reads that to meet the ambitious emissions targets, Australia would be required to put “more than 20 times the number of battery electric passenger vehicles on the road than there are today”.

“This means over five million EVs that would otherwise have been petrol and diesel vehicles. Around half of all light vehicles sold between now and 2035 would need to be EVs.”

Currently EVs account for just eight per cent of all new passenger vehicles sold in Australia this year with 64,367 deliveries, having greatly increased in 2023 but stumbled in 2024 due to a year of weaker demand for market leader Tesla.

By contrast, petrol power reigns supreme with a 40.8 per cent market share, followed by diesels (30.8 per cent), traditional hybrids (160 per cent) and plug-in hybrids (0.4 per cent).

The CCA noted the continual development of EVs and subsequent price reductions will aid consumers to purchase battery-powered vehicles.

“In the transport sector, EVs are forecast to achieve cost parity with internal combustion engine vehicles, which currently account for more than half of all transport emissions, this decade or early next, across most major markets,” the 2035 Targets Advice reads.

“This will allow Australian households and businesses to make their next light vehicle purchase an EV at no greater expense than a traditional vehicle.

“Falling purchase prices, low cost of ownership, continued charging infrastructure rollout, battery technology improvements that enable more choice when it comes to larger vehicles and longer ranges, and government policies like the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard, could support similarly high uptake in Australia over the next decade.

“This would position Australia well for more significant emissions reductions beyond 2035.”

The introduction of the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) – where carmakers are fined $100 for each gram per kilometre the vehicles they sell exceed a set emissions limit – has also become key to cutting tailpipe emissions, and has already led to brands introducing cleaner models to Australia.

For ‘Type 1’ passenger vehicles, this limit is 141g/km in 2025, before reducing to 117g/km in 2026, 92g/km in 2027, 68g/km in 2028 and 58g/km in 2029.

For ‘Type 2’ light-commercial and off-road vehicles, the target is 210g/km in 2025, 180g/km in 2026, 150g/km in 2027, 122g/km in 2028 and 110g/km in 2029.

The NVES regulations are due to be reviewed next year, and the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) – the peak body for carmakers locally – says it is already helping to keep the market in touch with emissions targets.

“Carmakers are continuing to expand the range of low and zero emission vehicles, with more than 100 battery electric models and more than 50 plug-in hybrids now available in the Australian market,” FCAI chair Tony Weber said.

“However, BEVs make up less than eight per cent of new vehicle sales so far this year. This highlights that challenges still exist if we are to meet the targets set by government.

“Consumers are not yet purchasing EVs at the rate that was expected, nor at the rate required to meet the emissions targets.

“Key to driving EV take-up is ensuring there is adequate charging infrastructure, reducing the total cost of ownership and that EVs meet the needs and desires of Australian motorists.”

Weber noted both the government’s $40 million commitment to kerbside and fast EV chargers, as well as the FCAI’s members towards launching more vehicles locally.

“Ensuring the availability of charging infrastructure is essential if the NVES is to make a difference in meeting climate targets.

“The legislated 2026 review will be critical to providing an early indication of how the NVES is operating, and how other policies and funding programs are influencing the market.”

It’s worth noting the non-legislated target of Australia’s EV mix reaching 85 per cent by 2035 is still well behind other major markets, such as the European Union where new petrol and diesel vehicles will be banned from sale by that deadline.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: australia; bootonface4ever; chicom; climatechange; electricvehicle; environmentalists; evs; globalists; globohomo; policestate; ukraine; vehicles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: shaggy eel

Maybe. Not that many places in the Far East I want to visit, even if I could afford a lot of foreign travel.


41 posted on 09/20/2025 8:45:28 PM PDT by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Tonight’s news reports were full of the imfotmation that last year we had 30,000 deaths caused by wildfire smoke and lung problems. It was particularly deadly where there was also air pollution caused by vehicle air pollution. It will definitely be getting worse the reports said.


42 posted on 09/21/2025 1:50:26 AM PDT by gleeaikin (Question Authority: report facts, and post their links.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WhiteHatBobby0701; ProtectOurFreedom

Not only trees.

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is a plant growth stimulant. Included in that is food crops. It makes food easier to grow and thus less expensive. Conversely, their actions would make food more expensive.

Why do these monsters wish to starve the poor?


43 posted on 09/21/2025 3:35:41 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Something changed dramatically in recent decades. In the post World War II period there was a lot of effort into getting Americans the ability to own a home. Government backed long term low interest rate mortgages. Technology made our lives easier, with more time for leisure. Better health care. Norman Borlaug and food scientists developed cultivars for feeding the world. Better crop production, inexpensive electricity benefitting everyone, including business.

Then like a light switch starting particularly in the 1970s it was All Gloom and Doom All The Time. It just keeps getting worse.

Outlaw gasoline, diesel, natural gas. No nukes. Eat Bugs. Anti-family, anti-human. It’s really almost demonic.


44 posted on 09/21/2025 5:24:00 AM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4UsAll

Then like a light switch starting particularly in the 1970s it was All Gloom and Doom All The Time.


Then like a light switch starting particularly in the 1970s it was All Gloom and Doom All The Time. It just keeps getting worse.

Outlaw gasoline, diesel, natural gas. No nukes. Eat Bugs. Anti-family, anti-human. It’s really almost demonic.


I call it the rise of the Mediacracy. The Media had been taken over by Progressives (American leftists). They took over the journalism schools. Once they found they had the power, through Television, to get rid of a Senator (McCarthy) then to drive a very popular president (Nixon) from office, they became the dominant political force.

They were internationalists who saw nationalism as evil and the source of war, and leftists who saw government as an unlimited source of good.


45 posted on 09/21/2025 6:00:33 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4UsAll

Then like a light switch starting particularly in the 1970s it was All Gloom and Doom All The Time. It just keeps getting worse.

Outlaw gasoline, diesel, natural gas. No nukes. Eat Bugs. Anti-family, anti-human. It’s really almost demonic.


I call it the rise of the Mediacracy. The Media had been taken over by Progressives (American leftists). They took over the journalism schools. Once they found they had the power, through Television, to get rid of a Senator (McCarthy) then to drive a very popular president (Nixon) from office, they became the dominant political force.

They were internationalists who saw nationalism as evil and the source of war, and leftists who saw government as an unlimited source of good.


46 posted on 09/21/2025 6:02:04 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: WhiteHatBobby0701

Because Australians didn’t slaughter the police who forced them into Covid camps.


47 posted on 09/21/2025 6:13:49 AM PDT by nonliberal (Russia is not my enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
"I wouldn’t have any EV if it was given to me. Totally useless unless you’re golfing."

Exactly the way I thought until I rode in a friend's Tesla a few weeks ago. The sound system and entertainment system was so good that we hardly noticed the time at the charger.

I was particularly impressed with how safe a driver it was in self-driving mode. It detected a vehicle slowing three football field ahead of us and slowed down, and had no trouble dealing with three bicyclists that crossed our path as we turned onto a highway.

This coming from the owner of two old, gas-guzzling Expeditions - which I personally would not trade for his EV for a number of other reasons.

48 posted on 09/21/2025 10:24:54 AM PDT by The Duke (Not without incident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

Unfortunately it seems Poison Ivy really loves CO2. I never saw such robust PI 70 years ago, and since allergic I have been watching it carefully all these years.


49 posted on 09/21/2025 10:49:39 AM PDT by gleeaikin (Question Authority: report facts, and post their links.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

I’d never ride in a self driving car period. I don’t trust or need all the cameras, technology and crap that comes with most of the new vehicles, it’s more distraction than anything.

The government says don’t text and drive but cars have their own wifi hot spots and you can watch movies while driving then these asinine infotainment systems won’t let you make some changes on a GPS map while you’re driving.

I’d rather be getting 9mpg in a loud gas guzzler any day.


50 posted on 09/21/2025 10:53:46 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: WhiteHatBobby0701
Why the (Australian) government wants to tell you what car to buy

So they can Nazi you using the highways.

51 posted on 09/21/2025 1:50:06 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (President Trump Decisively Won Popular & E.C., Celebrate Recivilization!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
Well, I've felt infinitely less save with certain drivers than I did the other day in my friend's Tesla. In fact, I found myself wishing that my sons got EVs so they'd be safer (which means, of course, that they'll do *anything* but get an EV).

But, like you, it's gas guzzlers for me.

52 posted on 09/21/2025 5:14:50 PM PDT by The Duke (Not without incident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson