It’s not an exact parallel, but I’m seeing potential ways the widow can extend and enhance her late husband’s legacy.
I first saw it with both Jackie O. and Coretta Scott King.
Both women made well thought out decisions on how to keep the movement of their late spouses going and growing stronger.
Just as poster packrat35 has described: Both widows inspired others to do the work of the foot soldiers, as they continued to raise their kids.
I’m not comparing Charlie K. to JFK or MLK in an even way.
Charlie was still at an early stage in his position as formidable influence.
I’m saying he had the potential to have an outsized impact on society, just as they did.
“I’m not comparing Charlie K. to JFK or MLK in an even way.”
Charlie stands far above either of them. In every way.