Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: kiryandil
That would mean that if a state bans a category of firearms, like assault weapons, you have no standing because they didn't put your name in the bill. Or if the Feds banned "all speech that runs counter to public policy," you couldn't sue.

The court's ruling is absurd.

24 posted on 09/06/2025 6:09:31 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: pierrem15

Yeah, I’m gonna have to re-examine the ruling, because what you said seems logical.


25 posted on 09/06/2025 6:17:32 PM PDT by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson