[Impala64ssa]

Rhetorical question of the day: Would the school administration react the same way if a student painted Qur'anic verses or Wiccan symbolism in their parking space?

[crusty old prospector]

You misspelled demonic verses.

[MtnClimber]

Would the school react the same way if she wanted to paint rainbows or LGBTQRT+++ slogans?

[goodnesswins]

Stupid that a school allows students to paint public property

[Opinionated Blowhard]

No one should be painting anything on a school parking spot. Unless the school allowed others to paint their spots, she shouldn’t be allowed to do this.

[FlingWingFlyer]

Hopefully the school has the same policy for the Black Looters Movement or somebody is going to get their butts sued.

[Leaning Right]

The student should prevail, but only if she can show that school has already allowed other religious or political messages.

Otherwise, the school should prevail, as it has the right to set reasonable boundaries. Because if a Christian message is allowed, so would an Islamic message.

And I would not want children exposed to Muslim propaganda. Remember, we’re talking children here. Even in high school, they can be quite impressionable.

[Mark]

Now, go out and buy a mansion.

[algore]

She should settle for some definitions she can get from the Devil’s Dictionary

[T.B. Yoits]

Once these institutions supported the LGBTQRSTUV religion, they lost any argument against whatever sign, symbol, or text someone wanted to use.

[DesertRhino]

The law is crystal clear on this. If they allow everybody else to decorate their space as they see fit, they can’t stop a Christian message. It’s exactly the same as letting students wear all kind of jewelry, but banning a crucifix necklace. The young lady is probably about to get her college paid for with a settlement. She needs to contact the ACLJ immediately.

[Doctor Congo]

She should have conspired with a friend who would post a Koran verse.

[sauropod]

Bkmk

[AppyPappy]

Clearly a Hate crime by the school.