Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/03/2025 6:14:58 PM PDT by lasereye
Across the Western world, governments have opened the floodgates to mass third-world immigration. It is questionable whether such policies have been popular anywhere, and it is hard to identify a country where citizens have ever voted for them. Thus, unrest has been inevitable. The international political class has usually responded to popular discontent over immigration by shutting down speech and criminalizing dissent. Meanwhile, a number of European countries are rapidly becoming unrecognizable.
Why this crazed dedication to an unpopular and likely suicidal policy? I wish I knew.
Yesterday, there were massive protests across the United Kingdom against the Uniparty’s immigration policies. This march took place in Manchester:
"Rule Britannia - Patriots Take Over Manchester 🇬🇧 - Antifa Counter Protest 👎 🧐" >
The marchers are waving the Union Jack, the flag of the United Kingdom, and St. George’s Cross, the flag of England. It is generally considered “far right” to display the English flag in England.
Opponents of mass third-world immigration are inhibited because they lack a vocabulary with which to oppose the inevitable charge of “racism,” a charge that is leveled just about everywhere, except against actual instances of racism. But why is it so difficult? A man from Cameroon, say, may be a wonderful gentleman, and he may be heir to a “vibrant” culture–a common euphemism in this context–but he is not British, and the culture to which he is heir is not British culture. Why is it out of bounds to say that Britain should be (predominantly, anyway) for the British, as France should be for the French, Germany for the Germans, Sweden for the Swedes? And that any minorities in those countries should adapt to the native cultures, not the other way around?
This queasiness seems to be exclusively a Western phenomenon. The Chinese have no doubt that China is their country, and the Chinese government displays no urge to import foreigners. If it did import foreigners, it would use them for slave labor. Same with the Japanese, except for the slave labor part.
Meanwhile, the Islamization of Britain continues apace. News is censored, lest people get the wrong (i.e., right) idea:
It's worth spelling out why they act like this.
Britain's establishment is aware that the migration policies it imposed have been an economic and social disaster. It also knows that it would be completely delegitimising to admit this. https://t.co/g35HDy4s65— Sam Ashworth-Hayes (@SAshworthHayes) August 3, 2025
Local police forces haven't quite twigged that attempting to conceal information is now doing quite a lot to fuel "tensions", and in particular the impression that the state is not on the side of its people. https://t.co/W9hLgKIn4H pic.twitter.com/ZtiMlHN0cj— Sam Ashworth-Hayes (@SAshworthHayes) August 2, 2025
I recently noticed in the news that Keir Starmer’s Labour government has lowered the voting age to 16. This is the kind of thing liberals have tried to do in the U.S., on the assumption that most kids will vote Democrat. But in Britain, Mark Steyn points out, the reason goes deeper:
Britain’s government has decided to lower the voting age to sixteen. Almost all the commentary has focused on whether schoolchildren are informed or responsible enough to vote. Reading such bollocks is a complete waste of your time. The principal practical effect of sixteen-year-old electors will be to increase the migrant vote long before the formal handover of demographic supremacy in 2063 or whenever. As Richard North writes at The Conservative Woman:In most Muslim households, it is a dead cert that the heads of the households will use the postal votes of their children to favour candidates pre-selected by the baradari (clan) elders at the mosques.As someone once said, the future belongs to those who show up, and with Starmer’s legislation it shows up early. “Diversity” is not equally distributed: the Zimmer-frame vote is still overwhelmingly Anglo-Celtic; among newborns, forty per cent have at least one non-UK parent.
I wish Britain’s protesters well, but it is hard to be optimistic about where this all ends. In civil war, possibly, or in a takeover of countries like the U.K. by foreign elements, analogous to the Germanic invasions of the fifth and sixth centuries only with more radical consequences. Or possibly Britain and other countries will turn back from the brink with sane immigration policies. If it is not already too late.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
It is generally considered “far right” to display the English flag in England.
Goodbye England. It was nice knowing you.
The leadership of the two major parties in the UK (one of which is the “Conservative Party”) are traitors.
I’d rather vote for The Silly Party.
Good!
Something’s Gotta Give
sung by Frank Sinatra. Released January 5, 1959.
Written by the great Johnny Mercer.
When an irresistible force such as you
Meets an old immovable object like me
You can bet just as sure as you live
Somethin’s gotta give, somethin’s gotta give, somethin’s gotta give.
So en garde, who knows what the fates might have in store?
From their vast mysterious sky?...
Fight, fight, fight, fight, fight it with all of our might
Chances are some heavenly star-spangled night
We’ll find out just as sure as we live
Somethin’s gotta give, somethin’s gotta give, somethin’s gonna give
There may be a simple answer: The leaders of those countries don’t have children. They don’t care about the future.
changing to sane immigration policies
will lead to civil war
it is already too late
it is possible to avoid a complete takeover
but not without a civil war
The whole place is on fire over the ‘’boats’’ as they call them. The French are sending the garbage across The Channel to be the Brits problem and the whole island is a hot mess!
And they're BEGGING Trump to come and save them.
You have to see this. It's shocking.
“I’d rather vote for The Silly Party’’.
I stand with the “Standing At The Back And Looking Silly Party’’.
In 2016, you could argue that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan were in charge of the Republican Party.
Once Trump got in the White House, Paul Ryan decided to quit even though he was the Speaker at the time.
In the UK, the globalist-manufactured migrant invasion is entering the 3rd stage.
things will get spicy.
If they had sunk the boats at the outset, they wouldn’t have this problem.
What is Ryan doing these days? I haven’t heard him say anything about the second Trump administration. Which is a good thing I guess.
Now works for Rupert Murdoch. Ryan was nothing but a rino deep stare whore. That water in DC, something strange about it, even Thune has become addicted to it.
The only peaceful way to save Britain:
Step 1: Close the country down. Don’t let even one more illegal get in.
Step 2: Pay each illegal already there whatever it takes to get them to leave.
Both steps require more than a little courage.
Neither step stands even the remotest chance of happening. So as you noted, it’s either civil war or a complete takeover. I suppose the blokes in the barracks will have the final vote on that.
“Suicidal” ?
That is most definitely not the right word. Think of other words that might better describe. Notice you’ll hear people say anodyne things like “We’re bringing people into this country who blah blah blah” We have done no such thing. Who is this “we” kemosabe?
Nobody wants this much less voted for this. The entire point of representative government is for elected leaders to fear being ousted if they do not represent their citizens. “Our precious Democracy” indeed.
If you can’t change the voters minds, change the voters. No difference than the Democrats plan here in the US.
Some party hack decreed that the people
had lost the government’s confidence
and could only regain it with redoubled effort.
If that is the case, would it not be simpler,
If the government simply dissolved the people
And elected another?
Bertolt Brecht
They’re going to have to save themselves. At least some of them are now awake and willing to take action!!!
Agreed. He's Donald Trump, not Jesus Christ.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.