To: whyilovetexas111
whyilovetexas111 wrote: “Maybe we don’t even need tanks anymore?”
If this is a shift towards a high peer conflict then that implies more need for heavy vehicles like tanks.
5 posted on
07/23/2025 10:31:55 AM PDT by
DugwayDuke
(Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
To: DugwayDuke
Go watch some drones taking out tanks vids from Ukraine. Get back to us.
7 posted on
07/23/2025 10:33:38 AM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: DugwayDuke
That’s the point - the M-10 isn’t a tank, though it weighs as much as one and is too large to be used in the manner planned.
10 posted on
07/23/2025 10:36:30 AM PDT by
TheBattman
(Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists-Satanists: redundant labels.)
To: DugwayDuke
too heavy for air deployment, was no longer cost-effective, and could not be adapted for future battlefields.
12 posted on
07/23/2025 10:38:19 AM PDT by
TexasGator
(11/I1.here is no Sharknado system)
To: DugwayDuke
Out of the 31 Abrams tanks we gave the Ukraine, four (at last count) remain operational.
At least one or two are in red square.
14 posted on
07/23/2025 10:40:37 AM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
To: DugwayDuke
A little less jargon and a little more English; what is high peer conflict?
15 posted on
07/23/2025 10:43:19 AM PDT by
DPMD
(u)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson