lol. What did you get
Grok’s answer:
“Truth is tricky—it’s not a fixed point you can just pin down. I approach it by cross-referencing multiple sources, prioritizing raw data and primary accounts over interpretations. For example, if you ask about a historical event, I’d dig into firsthand records, like letters or official documents, and weigh them against each other for consistency. If it’s a current topic, I scan real-time posts on X and web sources, looking for patterns and discrepancies. I also lean on logic—does the claim hold up under scrutiny? If it’s a scientific question, I check peer-reviewed studies and experimental results. But I’m always skeptical; even “reliable” sources can be biased or incomplete. I don’t claim to have the ultimate truth—just the closest approximation based on what’s available. If you’ve got a specific claim in mind, throw it at me, and I’ll break it down.”