Posted on 07/09/2025 8:06:42 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
The Deep State will NEVER kill itself.
There are 2 sets of data:
1.) The set of data that is controlled by the US govt.
This set of data shows that the most powerful people in the country (world) have lots of odd ties to Epstein. This set of data has no blackmail value but lots of uncomfortable insinuations. It contains money trails, flight logs, maybe NSA spying records, etc...
This set of data also contains proof that Epstein was working for Mossad. Disclosing this would put incredible strain on international relations.
Disclosing the long list of odd ties will do nothing to bring the bad guys to justice but will certainly make lots of powerful people enemies of Trump. I also believe that Trump himself is mixed right in with all of these powerful names.
The lack of specificity and the inclusion of members of both parties and elite is why the Democrats never used the data to hurt Trump.
2.) The second set of data are the actual fruits of the honeypot operation. These have never been in the hands of the U.S. govt. It was given directly to Mossad as it was created. Copies, backups, etc... were either destroyed in real time or cleaned up right before or after Epstein was taken down.
At this point, the ONLY thing the Trump admin has is circumstantial evidence indicating that there was a conspiracy by Israel to gain intelligence and kompromat over global leaders.
Is the risk of revealing this and the possible reprisals by Israel worth the benefit of making MAGA people feel better?
Trump has decided that it is not.
aren’t “we” voters? I am
We are not the problem.
It is the “low information” “low turnout” voters that will be affected by the Epstein story imho.
If you want to see the Democrat talking points in 2026 here they are in detail from the Compost—these are ready made campaign ads:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/07/08/jeffrey-epstein-bondi-patel-trump/
“June 2, 2024
Fox & Friends co-host Rachel Campos-Duffy: “Would you declassify the Epstein files?”
Donald Trump: “Yeah, yeah, I would. I guess I would. I think that less so, because you don’t know — You don’t want to effect people’s lives if there’s phony stuff in there, because there’s a lot of phony stuff in that whole world.”
Sept. 3, 2024
(Donald) Trump, to podcast host Lex Fridman: “Yeah, I’d certainly take a look at it. … Yeah, I’d be inclined to the do the Epstein, I’d have no problem with it.”
Oct. 22, 2024
Then-Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) to podcast host Theo Von: “Seriously, we need to release the Epstein list. That is an important thing.”
Jan. 30, 2025
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tennessee): “So, will you work with me on this issue so we know who worked with Jeffrey Epstein in building these sex trafficking rings?
Kash Patel, FBI director nominee: “Absolutely senator.”
...Feb. 21, 2025
Fox News host John Roberts: “[You said recently that] DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein’s clients? Will that really happen?
Attorney General Pam Bondi: “It is sitting on my desk right now, to review.”
March 1, 2025
Fox News host Mark Levin: “So once all that’s gathered you’re just going to put it out in the public, with the obvious necessary redactions … but for the perpetrators I assume that we’ll see those names, yes?
Bondi: “Well, certainly, nothing can be withheld on that. …”
March 11, 2025
Habba, to media personality Benny Johnson: “I personally have checked in. They are going through it. You have to be patient. Because when you are wanting to prosecute and actually do something with the information that you have, you have to make sure that you save the integrity of the investigation so that we can bring these people to justice, so that we can hold grand juries, so that we can do certain things.”
May 28, 2025
Patel to Fox News host Bret Baier: “I’m not going to withhold information from the American public, ever. … We are diligently working on that, and it takes time to go through years of investigations, years of political maneuvering, and years of cover-up.”
June 6, 2025
Rogan: “The narrative has always been that there’s video. Now, where’s the chain of custody? Is there evidence that there’s video? Is there evidence that it was moved around? Stored? Protected from people looking at it?”
Patel: “You’re going to get all that information. Like, that’s literally what we’re putting together. And we’re going to give you every single thing we have and can. And that’s the whole point. … Now we’re figuring out how to put it out.”
Feb. 27, 2025
Journalist Piers Morgan: “Do you think that by releasing information from these files we are likely to see criminal actions being taken?”
Alina Habba, counsel to the president: “Absolutely. I think it would be negligent for us not to. You have to hold individuals who are indeed rapists, accountable. We have to have them tried, in my opinion.”
“Low info voters know very little about very little.”
Agreed.
My post said that they “will” know in the future.
That is what the Democrats vicious attack ads will do a year from now.
When the Democrats are done with their ads even the lowest information voters will be able to recognize Bondi and Patel on the street.
I joined a frat house who didn’t have to study for their courses. They had the answers to the tests from the upper class members. While I was trying to study, they had us in the dining room at 3 AM saying the house motto upside down against the back wall. From there my education got complicated, but I did earn a BA in English Lit at another college.
Plausibly anti-Semitic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.