You’d need to know the timeline and context to understand any of this.
The head of the DCA described them as notes, scribblings, thoughts, etc and was clear that there was no “manfesto” in the form of a long formal explanation or justification of the shooters motivation. Just notebooks with notes, so the names could mean anything from a hit list to people who pissed him off years ago (i.e. the dead guy).
I know this is FR and it won’t make any difference, but only fools attempt to extrapolate meaning from 3rd hand reports without examining the source documents themselves.
“only fools attempt to extrapolate meaning from 3rd hand reports without examining the source documents themselves”
You remove all those people from FR brother and it’s more than likely just gonna be You and me. Lol!