[Macho MAGA Man]

Look at the date of the article, May 15, 2025. This was all planned by the Chief Justice of the Court, an Obama lifetime appointee who bypassed the process of random judge selection and personally handpicked the activists to render the decision he wanted.

[shanover]

This judicial tyranny will destroy the republic if not stopped. The Founders warned us about it.

[Dogbert41]

That three judge panel needs to wake up in cells in Cuba.

[Resolute Conservative]

It is time to accept that nothing will be done unless some sort of action is taken by the people since it is obvious that the Supremes and Congress are happy doing nothing. Sadly, most people are happy with the phones, social media, and sports addictions and don’t want to rock the boat. I have made calls, written letters/emails as have many here, but our drop in the bucket isn’t going to get us there.

[Sarah Barracuda]

The problem is that Trump waited too darn long to make deals with these countries..he knew the court will eventually rule against him, delaying and delaying did not do him any favors..Japan wanted to make a deal, India wanted to make a deal, get on the phone and make a deal that benefits both sides..now he has to hope some other court overrules these douche bags otherwise no one is going to do any deal with him why would they

[jpp113]

Ok, lets get this straight.

1. Leftwing Activist federal judges allow standing to several states to file suit.

2. Leftwing Activist judges hearing the suit then say the executive branch has usurped Congressional power.

Big problem with that is if Congresses' power has been usurped, then legally ONLY Congress has STANDING to bring the suit.

[Wuli]

A Wall Street Journal article weeks ago predicted the outcome in the special court that heard the case.

There is a different area of law the WH could have used to justify the tariffs, and it would have been a safer bet than the “national emergency” provision that they used. Instead of the EO on tariffs invoking a “national security” provision, it could have invoked Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows for tariffs that “counter unfair trade practices”. But that was not the legal basis they used in the EO on tariffs. They should have. I think Trump got bad legal advice. He could still win on appeal, but it may require trying to make a difficult change of gears on the justification, or an immediate new WH EO using the Section 301 provision.

[Mariner]

Personnel is policy.

[Vaduz]

It appears the IRS should audit a few judges to many are being influenced and not by law?.