Was This Written By Cats? The Guardian Hisses Dogs Are An ‘Insidious’ Climate Threat

NewsBusters ^ | 4/16/2025 | Joseph Vazquez

[JV3MRC]

First it was the cow farts. Now it’s dog “sh*t.” Moral of the story: eco crazies will never be satisfied until people start seeing climate change threats in their soup.

Leftist newspaper The Guardian published an April 9 story that reeked of being desperate for attention, even if that meant making its writers look like cats that have been overdosing on catnip. “Pet dogs have ‘extensive and multifarious’ impact on environment, new research finds,” read the headline coughed up like a hairball from science writer Donna Lu.

The syntax read like a Babylon Bee special, “An Australian review of existing studies has argued that ‘the environmental impact of owned dogs is far greater, more insidious, and more concerning than is generally recognised.”

The equally nutty outlet Mother Jones reposted Lu’s story and made dogs out to be the antagonists of the supposed climate war in its re-written headline: “Bad News for Man’s Best Friend: Dogs Are Environmental Villains.” Talk about screwing the pooch.

[Jonty30]

In a decade, this will be the standard liberal position.

[antidemoncrat]

This is nothing compared to the CO2 issued from the hot air expelled in Washington DC every day.

[metmom]

What never seems to occur to them is that eliminating pets and pet ownership will not eliminate the animals.

Instead of owned, trained pets, they’ll be a bigger threat than ever spreading more disease and destruction as feral animals than domesticated ones.