It's an experiment, illegally covered under an Emergency Use Authorization despite alternative treatments and prior immunity that would negate the EUA. Outside of that, once Congress exempted themselves and illegal aliens, the order was unlawful.
As for "The military takes many different types of injections yearly or for special locations even today.", those are not experimental treatments. The manufacturers are liable for them, unlike the MurdeRNA shots.
And the offended members had the opportunity to separate if they wished. No harm, no foul.
No foul? You're kidding, right? Some lost pensions. Service members people invested time, energy, and effort in a career. Enlisted members sign a contract which the military reneged on.
Your attitude of "and the offended members had the opportunity to separate if they wished" is exactly the mentality that breeds distrust of government and the military. Good luck running a military with that mindset. No one looking at one or two tours would take that risk and certainly no one planning on making a career of the military would either. Who's going to join a profession where you could be told months before retirement that you either get injection raped with some experimental concoction or lose your pension when you walk away?
It was an unlawful order and from the top down they need to face charges.
I get into this discussion every time it comes up about the vaccines in the early 90’s and information still says the same things.
“You don’t need proof of injury to refuse an order to be a lab rat.”
Covid vacinations, like I mentioned, had been around since 1970. If the media had not lied about the contents of the vaccines, and that they were no more dangerous than current flu shots and allergy injections at the time, no one would have said anything. If people wanted to buy into what the media was saying, that can’t be helped because no one wants to take them on. Even when they lie to get their rags bought off the stand.
An unlawful order has to have some substance of fact to be unlawful. Article 92 provides the following guidance regarding unlawful orders: “Lawfulness. A general order or regulation is lawful unless it is contrary to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, or lawful superior orders or for some other reason is beyond the authority of the official issuing it. Insubordination is when a service member willfully disobeys the lawful orders of a superior officer.”
Like I mentioned before, if the order was given from the command all the way to the POTUS determines that the reason for the order was for the mission and does not harm priorty properties or personnel, and at that time, it didn’t, then it was a lawful order and failing to obey it fell into article 92 of the UCMJ which could have constituted time in jail. The members were allowed to discharge at more than bad conduct, they were released of their commitment of the military they signed the contract for. They were fed and paid up to that point. If they chose not to follow the order, that’s on them. And since they could be released, then it was their decision to separate.
And that’s the bottom line. I’m sorry you didn’t like the order, but I gave you the facts from when it was started and why it was used. So those that disobeyed, chose to and were discharged. You can’t come back 40 years later and hindsight someone into chains for doing what they were told. And 1991 was the transfer from Reagan to Bush I. And both them are dead. You’ve got no one to get. And I’m done since I’m just repeating what I previous said. Good luck.
wy69