[cuz1961]

Wow. That's some turgid prose there. Difficult to get through while trying to extract the point. Admittedly I gave it a heavy scan— twice. Focused on the part about the earlier court case. Saw nothing that cashed the check the headline wrote. GP is crap

\/

i understood it just fine.

maybe you need a remedial reading comprehension course ?

are you affiliated in any way with an NGO ?

do you have a rice bowl in jeopardy ? or are you just assigned to the GP narrative control cubicle in the free republic division ?

[j.havenfarm]

I do hope the slams were tongue in cheek, because otherwise you’re a hair trigger nut. I do legal writing for a living and, frankly, I’m very good at it. The standard is points are clearly stated so by even a quick review the reader can get the principle points. This legal writing doesn’t come close to that standard