Posted on 03/25/2025 9:58:37 AM PDT by FiddlePig
Use Democrat "rules" to challenge these rulings! Could also has the extra benefit of exposing Democrat "Wokeazi" hypocrisy. How 'spose they'd react?
How much CO2 does a burning Tesla make? The Wokeazis went from demands to mandate electric cars to setting them on fire and they wonder why they're seen as insane lunatics!
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof...shall be the supreme Law of the LandUS Const., Art VI, Cl. 2.
The bottom line, he CAN ignore these lower courts as long as he is supported by the GOP. If they refuse to impeach him for it, he is golden.
The Founders created Congress as the most powerful, the President a close second, and the judiciary a distant third.
The judiciary badly needs it’s wings clipped and Congress can do that better than anyone.
All of this judicial tyranny lies right at the feet of the feckless GOP leadership in Congress.
Thomas Jefferson warned the courts and judges could become “Black Robed despots.” The showdown with rouge judges is a fight that must happen. Hopefully, the Constitution will prevail. I assert that all “case law” needs to be voided if not passed by Congress. Of course that would mean congress would have to do their job.
As a mentally competent, law-abiding citizen of voting age do you have a constitution right to have a gun?
Yes, but you still need to fill out a Form 4473 and wait.
Judges could be made to fill out 4473Is and 4473Js and wait for an executive department response.
Since congressional law itself MUST be "IN PURSUANCE" of the Constitution (US Const., Art. VI, Cl. 2), void all congressional law that is unconstitutional. Then void all SCOTUS decisions that are unconstitutional.
That's a good start.
Jefferson:
“The Constitution of the United States having divided the powers of government into three branches, legislative, executive, and judiciary, and deposited each with a separate body of magistracy, forbidding either to interfere in the department of the other, the executive are not at liberty to intermeddle in [a] question [that] must be ultimately decided by the Supreme Court.” —Thomas Jefferson to Charles Hellstedt, 1791. ME 8:126
“A judiciary independent of a king or executive alone is a good thing; but independence of the will of the nation is a solecism, at least in a republican government.” —Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Ritchie, 1820. ME 15:298
“The original error [was in] establishing a judiciary independent of the nation, and which, from the citadel of the law, can turn its guns on those they were meant to defend, and control and fashion their proceedings to its own will.” —Thomas Jefferson to John Wayles Eppes, 1807. FE 9:68
“It is a misnomer to call a government republican in which a branch of the supreme power is independent of the nation.” —Thomas Jefferson to James Pleasants, 1821. FE 10:198
“We have... [required] a vote of two-thirds in one of the Houses for removing a judge; a vote so impossible where any defense is made before men of ordinary prejudices and passions, that our judges are effectually independent of the nation. But this ought not to be. I would not indeed make them dependent on the Executive authority, as they formerly were in England; but I deem it indispensable to the continuance of this government that they should be submitted to some practical and impartial control, and that this, to be impartial, must be compounded of a mixture of state and federal authorities.” —Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821. ME 1:120
“Impeachment is a farce which will not be tried again.” —Thomas Jefferson to William B. Giles, 1807. ME 11:191
“Let the future appointments of judges be for four or six years and renewable by the President and Senate. This will bring their conduct at regular periods under revision and probation, and may keep them in equipoise between the general and special governments. We have erred in this point by copying England, where certainly it is a good thing to have the judges independent of the King. But we have omitted to copy their caution also, which makes a judge removable on the address of both legislative houses.” —Thomas Jefferson to William T. Barry, 1822. ME 15:389
“Our different States have differently modified their several judiciaries as to the tenure of office. Some appoint their judges for a given term of time; some continue them during good behavior, and that to be determined on by the concurring vote of two-thirds of each legislative house. In England they are removable by a majority only of each house. The last is a practicable remedy; the second is not. The combination of the friends and associates of the accused, the action of personal and party passions and the sympathies of the human heart will forever find means of influencing one-third of either the one or the other house, will thus secure their impunity and establish them in fact for life. The first remedy is the better, that of appointing for a term of years only, with a capacity of reappointment if their conduct has been approved.” —Thomas Jefferson to A. Coray, 1823. ME 15:486
“Contrary to all correct example, [the Federal judiciary] are in the habit of going out of the question before them, to throw an anchor ahead and grapple further hold for future advances of power. They are then in fact the corps of sappers and miners, steadily working to undermine the independent rights of the States and to consolidate all power in the hands of that government in which they have so important a freehold estate.” —Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821. ME 1:121
“The judges... are practicing on the Constitution by inferences, analogies, and sophisms, as they would on an ordinary law. They do not seem aware that it is not even a Constitution formed by a single authority and subject to a single superintendence and control, but that it is a compact of many independent powers, every single one of which claims an equal right to understand it and to require its observance.” —Thomas Jefferson to Edward Livingston, 1825. ME 16:113
“It has long been my opinion, and I have never shrunk from its expression,... that the germ of dissolution of our Federal Government is in the constitution of the Federal Judiciary—an irresponsible body (for impeachment is scarcely a scare-crow), working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction until all shall be usurped from the States and the government be consolidated into one. To this I am opposed.” —Thomas Jefferson to Charles Hammond, 1821. ME 15:331
“At the establishment of our Constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions nevertheless become law by precedent, sapping by little and little the foundations of the Constitution and working its change by construction before any one has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance. In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life if secured against all liability to account.” —Thomas Jefferson to A. Coray, 1823. ME 15:486
“I do not charge the judges with wilful and ill-intentioned error; but honest error must be arrested where its toleration leads to public ruin. As for the safety of society, we commit honest maniacs to Bedlam; so judges should be withdrawn from their bench whose erroneous biases are leading us to dissolution. It may, indeed, injure them in fame or in fortune; but it saves the republic, which is the first and supreme law.” —Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821. ME 1:122
https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Politics/ThomasJefferson/jeff1270.htm
Wont matter. The day the dems get back in power they will file articles of impeachment. Trump could have a 90% approval and they will still do it. They are that unhinged and will be drunk with power.
Exactly! The judges are ordering him to disobey the Constitution. Then they’ll try to impeach him for disobeying the Constitution. Impeached these judges for not following the Constitution themselves
That’s a wash, that will happen no matter what he does. And when he is out of office, he cannot be impeached. They can try to charge him, but even that will fail if he pardons himself as he leaves office.
Did you see the last impeachment? They did not care if he was out of office and they didn't even care that John Roberts said I am not coming to the Impeachment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.