This is exactly why tests like the ACT and SAT are so important in the college admissions process - something lefties sought to get rid of - and colleges are slowly and quietly reinstating b/c they are an extremely valuable tool to assess a student’s actual readiness for college - level work.
Of course, lefties call any/all testing of skills/merit “racist.”
> Princeton put a cap on the number of A’s that could be earned in each class. <
I’m a retired public high school teacher. And perhaps in the last 10 years of my career we were pressured to inflate grades. Oh, the stories I could tell you about that! Higher grades made the administrators look better. Actual student achievement was not a priority.
Nevertheless, I am bothered by what Princeton did there. An “A” means the student has mastered the material. In a good class, it’s quite possible that many students have achieved that goal. So why not many A’s?
The trick of course is defining “mastered the material”.
All students are now above average.
I think a similar program in other schools might help.
Solving the Fed/Powell/Yellen Caused Inflation Problem.
BTTT
I had a professor of linear algebra at a local JC who was an outstanding teacher (Jeff Mock, I remember you fondly). He taught seven classes and they were full. He graded every homework paper. If a student blew an exam, he offered "extra credit" assignments that allowed his students to raise their grade. His goal was that everybody EARNED an A. I promise you: upon completing those extra credit assignments one would understand the material well enough to have earned an A on that exam.
That was not grade inflation; it was student elevation, which ought to be the goal of every college and university. Thanks to Jeff Mock, and his like, I transferred successfully to Harvey Mudd College, a science and engineering school that was no joke.
To repeat: What is the goal here? It is a question about which the author seems to have offered no consideration.