Posted on 02/24/2025 8:05:33 AM PST by Red Badger
Actually, I’m all for letting the guilty sweat for awhile.
Matt is probably on the list.
I am kidding. Kind of.
We, as a people, need to prepare ourselves for names on that list that are unexpected and bad for the R side of the aisle.
Personally, at this stage, nothing would surprise me. I think DC and NY and Hollywood are full of dirty people. Anything short of Franklin Graham would not surprise me.
“I am not sure why there are questions about how to “use” this?
Release and let the chips fall where they may.”
*************
Agree 100%. That’s true transparency IMO.
Mitch McConnell? Lindsey Graham? Obama? Romney? McCain? The Pope?
I disagree, he told us it was our government which helped to prevent any further panic. We do not need to know all state secrets.
Biden knew it was our government and the democrats used it to create confusion and panic, it was just another media tool for them.
LOL! Good post.
He still has to comply with the law on such matters or there will be people who will have their case thrown out.
The only break I give are those went once, simply because Epstein was supposedly a businessman and this was a honeypot operation.
The FBI seized all of the videos on the island. There were and are drone videos taken of them packaging the tapes up as well as all of the camera systems from the pervo basement. They have the evidence. Kash has it now. So, now we will see. Forensic examination must have been done, but maybe not since the fibbies were acting under obamaumao’s perverted “gubmint”.
How about just f'ing drop it so there is no media narrative prep? Didn't think so?
Less talking, more arresting.
We will see. No one would be more pleased than me.
Someone was buying children to rape and torture - children that cartels were selling.
Maybe there’s major overlap between Epstein’s monsters and the cartel’s customers? Bet on it.
Maybe they should start with five to ten people daily.
The biggest names on Monday-Thursday. Keep the lesser known names for Fridays.
That way there will not be any lost in the news cycle.
That way EACH person will get maximum exposure.
WHEN she said it is on her desk seemed to me at the time that she was inviting such calls. I am not optimistic about the actual release, at least without lots of black bars on it. That is the sort of thing that should certainly not be announced, just done.
************
Most of the drones had port and starboard lights that complied with FAA requirements. So it was obvious to most people that the drones were ours.
As for the purpose, Trump himself said in January "I think it’s ridiculous that they're not telling you about what's going on with the drones." Instead of the report he promised on Day 1 we get a one word description of their activity -- "research", which is terribly vague and probably not what was "going on with the drones" (Trump's words mind you). The people deserve more transparency; we can handle it.
“They have the evidence.”
************
Unless it was “lost” or destroyed.
Obviously, our problems are much bigger than that.
“Where are Epstein’s bookkeeping records?”
This is really the most important thing. How did he become so rich? Who was he extorting?
We know that he was only handling the finances of one account Les Wexner. The owner of Victoria’s Secret and other companies. He gave Epstein his Manhattan house for $1.
This was Epstein’s first big house. The USVI island’s were his last purchases.
There has to be records of him receiving millions of dollars from various people he caught in his Honey Trap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.