Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bondi: “will no longer defend” the removal restrictions in court or in litigation regarding Administrative Law Judges.
Conservitive Brief ^ | 2/23/25 | Jon Dougherty

Posted on 02/23/2025 11:25:58 AM PST by MrZippy2k

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Eccl 10:2

For sure


21 posted on 02/23/2025 2:16:01 PM PST by SMARTY (In politics, stupidity is not a handicap. Napoleon Bonaparte I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eccl 10:2

Yes, thanks for asking that.

I was wondering that, too.


22 posted on 02/23/2025 2:25:18 PM PST by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Bookmarking


23 posted on 02/23/2025 2:29:47 PM PST by RandallFlagg (Democrats should have been barred from elections since The Battle Of Athens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EandH Dad

Good synopsis.

And as Vivek said when DOGE was being formed, we now have a fairly unprecedented window of opportunity to dismantle the administrative state, as the present Supreme Court has proven that it is willing to toss out regulations which have not been created by acts of Congress, but only by unelected executive department agencies. The “Chevron Desision” was a major victory and set the stage for more challenges to be decided the same way.


24 posted on 02/23/2025 3:10:52 PM PST by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JesusIsLord

“I don’t think Trump and Bondi now have the power to remove judges.”

These are a different kind of judges. They’re not in the Judicial branch at all.

L


25 posted on 02/23/2025 3:25:47 PM PST by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MrZippy2k

Talkin turkey..wooop woop

https://rumble.com/v6oe4p6-heavenly-evermoe.html


26 posted on 02/23/2025 4:06:40 PM PST by aces (and )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
AJLs are generally considered Article II (Executive) judges, not Article III (Judicial) judges......

Thanks for the info.

27 posted on 02/23/2025 4:11:18 PM PST by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
These are a different kind of judges. They’re not in the Judicial branch at all.

I learned something new. Tks.

28 posted on 02/23/2025 4:12:28 PM PST by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: egfowler3

No. Didn’t try to say it; just did a cheap reductio on the other guy’s post.


29 posted on 02/23/2025 4:14:06 PM PST by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JesusIsLord

Happy to be of service.

L


30 posted on 02/23/2025 4:14:20 PM PST by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson