Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WOW! Here is the Sneaky GOP Senator Behind Pete Hegseth’s Ex-Sister-in-Law’s 11th Hour Hit Piece Affidavit
Gateway Pundit ^ | Jan. 28, 2025 | by Cristina Laila

Posted on 01/28/2025 5:07:51 PM PST by Kazan

The Wall Street Journal revealed that GOP Senator Thom Tillis was behind helping Pete Hegseth’s former sister-in-law get her 11th hour affidavit with allegations of abuse to Senators before the confirmation vote.

As previously reported, Senators received an 11th hour affidavit with spousal abuse allegations against Trump’s Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegseth ahead of his confirmation vote.

An affidavit from Hegseth’s former sister-in-law, Danielle Hegseth, alleging “instances of abuse” and “mistreatment of a former spouse” involving Hegseth’s second wife, Samantha Hegseth, was submitted to senators.

Samantha Hegseth responded to the allegations via email, according to NBC News: “First and foremost, I have not and will not comment on my marriage to Pete Hegseth. I do not have representatives speaking on my behalf, nor have I ever asked anyone to share or speak about the details of my marriage on my behalf, whether it be a reporter, a committee member, a transition team member, etc.”

Samantha Hegseth added, “I do not believe your information to be accurate, and I have cc’d my lawyer.”

“There was no physical abuse in my marriage. This is the only further statement I will make to you, I have let you know that I am not speaking and will not speak on my marriage to Pete. Please respect this decision.”

The Walls Street Journal reported that Tillis told Danielle Hegseth that her sworn statement alleging abuse could get three Senators to flip and vote against Hegseth: His own, Murkowski, and Collins!

However, a few days later, it was reported by Fox News that the three Senators who may defect because of Danielle Hegseth’s affidavit included Mitch McConnell (KY), Lisa Murkowski (AK) and Susan Collins (ME).

The drama continued last Friday evening as the Senate convened for a late night vote to confirm Pete Hegseth as Defense Secretary.

The Wall Street Journal reported late Friday that Senator Thom Tillis who previously said he would vote ‘yes’ on confirming Hegseth, was still undecided. A ‘no’ vote from Tillis could sink Hegseth’s nomination if McConnell, Murkowski and Collins all vote no.

Tillis ended up voting “yes” to confirm Hegseth on Friday – Murkowski, Collins and McConnell all voted no so Vice President JD Vance had to come in with the tie-breaker.

However, Tillis raised eyebrows after The Wall Street Journal reported he was creating chaos behind the scenes.

Now we know why.

Sneaky Tillis was working behind the scenes to sabotage Pete Hegseth by encouraging Danielle Hegseth to submit her 11th hour affidavit with allegations of abuse.

The Wall Street Journal reported:

A key witness in the contentious Senate confirmation of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was assured by Sen. Thom Tillis (R., N.C.) that her sworn statement would carry weight in last week’s vote and could persuade Republican senators to oppose the nominee, according to people familiar with the events.

Tillis personally assured Danielle Hegseth in a call on Jan. 19, witnessed by two other people, that if she signed the statement testifying that she believed her former brother-in-law Pete Hegseth has an alcohol-abuse problem and was abusive to his second wife, it would carry weight, and potentially move three votes—his own, along with the votes of Sens. Susan Collins (R., Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R., Alaska), those people said.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 20250119; affidavit; blackstonebribes; blackstonegroup; boltonsbuddy; cambridgeanalytica; crookedsenator; daniellehegseth; destroythomtillis; foreignagent; foreignlobbyist; hegseth; hegsethfamily; johnbolton; lisamurkowski; louisdejoy; lowercostsmorecures; newbreed; pharmabribedtillis; pharmaceuticalmoney; pharmalobbyist; phrma; rinos; samanthahegseth; susancollins; thom; thomtillis; tillis; usps; uspsdonations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: Kazan

Doesn’t even know how to spell his own name.


21 posted on 01/28/2025 6:16:53 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

P


22 posted on 01/28/2025 6:23:48 PM PST by bitt (<img src=' 'width=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

I heard Charlie Kirk state the other day that he will unleash TPUSA and primary any senator that pulls this RINO crap, that is a force to be reckoned with. So far that pig (pun intended) Joni Ernst got that message.


23 posted on 01/28/2025 6:25:56 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Dang! I don’t even want to know what he’s been doing to sabotage the upcoming nominees, starting tomorrow.


24 posted on 01/28/2025 6:27:32 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
An affidavit from Hegseth’s former sister-in-law, Danielle Hegseth,

I'm curious as to why his ex sister-in-law has the last name, Hegseth.

25 posted on 01/28/2025 6:31:24 PM PST by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono

She was married to Pete’s brother at one time.


26 posted on 01/28/2025 6:32:34 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

He is a liar. His pants have been on fire for years. He lied to people in NC that he wouldn’t support a toll road going up through their town. But then he supported it. BIG LIAR.


27 posted on 01/28/2025 6:33:38 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Didn't work with Kavanaugh, either. It's getting really old.

Indeed, the #MeToo card is all played out.

28 posted on 01/28/2025 6:34:04 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono
I'm curious as to why his ex sister-in-law has the last name, Hegseth.

I think she was married to Pete's brother.

29 posted on 01/28/2025 6:34:15 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono

Because she kept her married name after she divorced.


30 posted on 01/28/2025 6:37:07 PM PST by gcparent (God Bless America )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: quantim

The GOP is as over as the dems


31 posted on 01/28/2025 6:39:15 PM PST by stanne (Because they were mesmerized by Obama, the man for whom this was named, whose name they left out of )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Murkowski, Collins and McConnell all voted no

The NRC supported all of the rinos and has the nerve to call in President Trump’s name and on his coat tails wanting contributions.
The entire of dc needs walling off and put to dust.


32 posted on 01/28/2025 6:39:24 PM PST by Recompennation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne
Just checked to see if an article was up - here's one from RCP:

Stop the Nonsense and Confirm Tulsi Gabbard
By Charlie Kirk

 

33 posted on 01/28/2025 6:45:15 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ryderann
I agree, he should remember what happened to Renee Elmers, a friend of Kevin McCarthy😉.
34 posted on 01/28/2025 6:51:18 PM PST by jonsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

Didn’t she give a speech a few years ago where she kept saying “like” and was just not well-spoken and was mocked? I vaguely remember something like that.


35 posted on 01/28/2025 7:05:51 PM PST by dandiegirl (BOBBY m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Get rid of Tillis.

To get rid of Linda, SC must close its Primary.


36 posted on 01/28/2025 7:08:05 PM PST by tennmountainman ( (“Less propaganda would be appreciated.” JimRob 12-2-2023 DITTO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

WHY did he want to sabotage the vote for Hegseth? What was his reason?

Paid off by the Dems?
Blackmailed?


37 posted on 01/28/2025 7:08:56 PM PST by hoagy62 (Hail Trump! Trump won! By a lot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Here’s the seat Lara Trump should be seriously targeting.


38 posted on 01/28/2025 7:12:40 PM PST by chickenlips (Neuter your politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gcparent
Because she kept her married name after she divorced.

His sister-in-law?

39 posted on 01/28/2025 7:15:32 PM PST by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

Good memory! But it was 16 years ago. She was under consideration for appointment to Hillary Clinton’s old Senate seat and was going around doing interviews.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/01/kennedy_is_interestingyou_know.html


40 posted on 01/28/2025 7:20:46 PM PST by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson