So, Mike Lee has a drinking problem?
Sheer idiocy.
“Sheer idiocy.”
It is in the U.S. Constitution.
However, I would only consider using it if the drug cartels become a problem.
“So, Mike Lee has a drinking problem?
Sheer idiocy.”
Do you? It is a very viable option and would be extremely effective. Do you even understand it? Or does it just compete with the options that make the MIC rich so automatically a no go don’t even think about it?
It has been used with great success through history.
“So, Mike Lee has a drinking problem?
Sheer idiocy.’
As long as there have been pirates. there have been pirate hunters.
The illegal human trafficing is the equivalent of slavery.
offering a private contractor a $$ bounty for every “slave” returned to their home port.
That would radically and quickly make the operation more expensive and less attractive. Same with paying X per pound of whatever drug will likely make it far more expensve to do business.
We are all grateful for your well thought out point by point rebuttal.
Not.
L
Its actually a really good idea. You just give them a cut of what they seize and if they get caught or killed not the government’s problem.
larrytown wrote:
“
So, Mike Lee has a drinking problem?
Sheer idiocy.
“
It’s in the Constitution.
Good enough for me.