Posted on 11/26/2024 4:47:44 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Senior advisers who worked on the Kamala Harris campaign have admitted that the vice president had no pathway to victory.
Speaking on the Pod Save America podcast, several campaign advisers to the Harris campaign shared some hard truths they could not admit during the presidential election.
“We were hopeful. I don’t know how optimistic we were, but we thought, OK, this is tied, and if a couple things break our way [we could win],” David Plouffe, a senior adviser to the campaign, said Tuesday.
Plouffe also admitted that internal polling also showed that Kamala Harris never took the lead over Trump, even admitting that public polls showing Harris in the lead left him surprised.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
She had no path to victory and no plan to pay them.
She’s like Sarah. Wouldn’t dis the man who gave her the not so big break. That’s ok.
The competence of the Socialist Democrats on display. Thank goodness Trump won.
I recall Hillary also owing vendors after her loss, not sure about the staffers though. I wonder how many of the staffers and vendors voted for Harris?
The Horse Race.
So they admit that raising all that money knowing they had NO chance of winning was nothing more than a massive money laundering operation to enrich themselves
Her only path to victory was Joe resigning completely and making her the President... But Democrats like Newsom and his supporter Nancy didn’t want that... They wanted Kamala to be the sacrificial lamb.
Shared delusion.
I wonder what their reaction was to the poll that said VP Harris was ahead in Iowa by 3 points.
And supposedly, according to a new poll, she’s the Democrats front runner for 2028....
The only way she could have “won” was by extensive cheating, and after 2020 who could rule that out?
Me, I’ll believe we’re out of the woods around sunset, January 20. (And crossing my fingers the inauguration will be lowkey and occur in the White House.)
This was why Trump was fairly restrained during the campaign and went easy on Kamala during the one debate they had. Why be nasty to her and potentially alienate women voters when you know you are going to win?
The reason I think there was very little caterwauling from the Democrats this time over the outcome was because they knew Kamala was doomed. (They actually thought Hillary would win in 2016).
The weekend before the election, the Kamala team was told to prepare for a devastating loss. The cake was baked long before.
razor thin margins... The Country has NEVER BEEN SO DIVIDED!
Yep, that poll was supposedly signaling a major shift.
After all , if she was suddenly that competitive in Iowa, then what about other states?
The Harris campaign was a $1.5 billion grift — possibly the biggest con job in American history. They sold their dumber-than-dirt, abortion-loving, perv-heavy base of suckers on the idea that all that stood between a dystopian, Handmaids’ Tale version of America was them and their weekly $25 ActBlue contributions.
So the Asian woman, who’s name escapes me, was right all along- they were lying to campaign donors....
This is going to leave a mark that will last a long, long time.
On top of all that, they mislead her supporters so badly with their scam that they were convinced she’d win in a landslide. Our country is even more divided now, plus thousands of her supporters, including my daughter, have cut ties with their families over politics & the lies they were fed about Trump. What liberals have done to America is disgusting!
You mean you tried every dirty filthy trick in the book and even made up some new ones, but you couldn’t get enough partisans interested in cheating for such an unqualified moron of a candidate?
Yeah, that was my take too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.