Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/28/2024 8:16:57 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: george76

doesn’t matter to them what the narrative is, as long as they control it.


2 posted on 10/28/2024 8:19:00 AM PDT by xoxox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Thanks


5 posted on 10/28/2024 8:42:34 AM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
This is GREAT news! How wonderful for Dr. Bhattacharya.

Victor D Hanson knows him well at Stanford and has interviewed him at least once.

Dr. Bhattacharya was later vindicated by the courts:

The 5th Circuit Agrees That Federal Officials Unconstitutionally 'Coerced' or 'Encouraged' Online Censorship
The appeals court narrowed a preliminary injunction against such meddling but confirmed the threat that it poses to freedom of speech.
By Jacob Sullum
September 11, 2023

A federal appeals court on Friday upheld key parts of a preliminary injunction against federal interference with content moderation on social media platforms. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit unanimously agreed that the White House, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the FBI had "coerced" or "significantly encouraged" the platforms, "in violation of the First Amendment," to suppress speech that federal officials viewed as dangerously inaccurate or misleading.


6 posted on 10/28/2024 9:34:38 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (It should be illegal to be here illegally. It should be a crime to be committing crimes in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson