[Eli Kopter]

A rogue DOJ can take any of the laws and either twist them or disregard them. They have proven that since Obama came into office (and accelerated under Biden-Harris). It is possible that they can take this new rule and use it if Harris does not certify a Trump victory. Is that the plan? Trump wins and Harris refuses to certify, and then a false flag operation begins in Washington D.C. and the Military is invoked. She could declare Martial Law and Biden would remain President for as long as they like (or invoke the 25th Amendment on Biden and assume leadership as a 'caretaker government').

[Newtoidaho]

” more than a thousand policies for directing department of defense activities”

No wonder those clowns can no longer win a war.

[rx]

A rogue DOJ can take any of the laws and either twist them or disregard them."

"Twist[ing] them" or "disregard[ing] the law need not be very obvious in the exercise of this new provision. There are at least two bites at the apple built into that to keep the Biden Administration's DOJ from accountability for actual lethality that may be used.

  1) DOJ chooses not to prosecute any military for cases that resulted in lethality, saying "no prosecutor would prosecute", "they were just following (the immune) President's orders" or "no jury would convict," or

  2) Any judge (e.g, corrupt) with jurisdiction could dismisses such cases on the basis of the judge's interpretation of recently rewritten policy, thereby avoiding accountability.

[Organic Panic]

Does anyone think Kamala Harris will allow any proceedings to certify that will go against her candidacy? I don’t. She will hold it up for months giving time for the miracle ballots to be discovered and get every lawsuit filed to throw out republican votes.

[Sequoyah101]

What a bunch of codswallop. I read the document, the whole document, when it came out and was posted to the CFR. It uses weasel words and references another document but it is clear what it does and how, it authorizes the military to come to the aid of locals UPON REQUEST and to use weapons that are clearly identified in LETHAL FORCE. Not even Martial Law is required in the case of this document or DoDD(irective)

If anyone believes this article or this source they are peddling straight and unfiltered blatant and intentional HORSESHIT.

As for your question, there is no such thing as coincidence.

[CodeToad]

It authorizes lethal force by stating lethal force is not prohibited.