Posted on 10/10/2024 6:58:46 AM PDT by Red Badger
>>None have treated him fairly, so which network should Trump choose? That’s the puzzler.
OANN, perhaps. RSBN?
Isn’t Sean Hannity an MMA fighter as well.
I remember constantly hearing about is martial arts prowess from him when I occasionally listened to him.
Why does it have to be networks hosting the debates? Why not independent agencies?
The desperation is palatable.
Harris is headed for an almost certain electoral defeat... And the Democrat knifes are out in force... Even CNN is starting to criticize her... A sure sign that the Democrat establishment has given up and is prepping for 2028... And a more sellable candidate like Newsom or Shapiro.
No democrat would ever agreed to a debate on even a neutral site. The networks you ask about have no chance of hosting.
Hannity couldn’t moderate a debate.
Before he finished asking the first question, the broadcast time would have expired. 🙄
Early voting has already started, it’s too late for a debate. They need to stop this early voting month. If they want early voting it should start the Saturday before the election and that will take care of those who can’t get off Election Day.
Trump had already done 2 debates. No reason for another at this point.
Winners cash out, losers cry DEAL!
AND more importantly, each candidate choosing their one moderator. A conservative moderator and a liberal moderator.
They are patriotic voters there. /s
They want the money and fame, they promote their hosts using debates to make a name for themselves at the expense of hosting an actual unbiased debate
Mark Levin, sure. Hannity, no way! I love the guy, but he’d spend the whole 90 minutes doing all the talking.
Polls are polls, who knows what’s true and what’s not but this indicates that the Harris campaign thinks they are not on a glide path to victory. The debates aren’t even debates, they are just talking points for the most part. At the end, after Trump gets them 60 million viewers they’ll spend an hour calling him racist and unfit to the 45 million who listen to the post debate sham show. I don’t see what’s to be gained if you’re President Donald J Trump. Let Comrade Harris figure out another way to pull in 60 million people.
Every debate should have two moderators and each candidate selects one.
I was glad to see the Mets eliminate the Phillies yesterday. New York City and Philadelphia both vote heavily Democrat, but New York state is going to go Democrat anyway, whereas Pennsylvania is winnable for Trump as long as the Democrats in Philadelphia don’t get away with enough cheating.
You can easily jam the RF signals in the venue making her earbuds unusable. The beauty of that is she would not know beforehand ... I would pay money to see the look on her face when she realizes she has no help.
There should be no moderators. Just let them sit down and interview each other. They can make their own rules.
The moderators shouldn’t be part of them “game”. It should be two people talking to each other with a Time Keeper to change topics after 15 minutes or so. The fact that we even know the names of the moderators tells you what you need to know about these phony debates.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.