"Former top Clinton adviser calls on ABC to launch internal probe into whether debate was rigged"
And, there is this:
More:
They should do a full internal investigation, hire an outside law firm. I don't know how much of this was planned in advance," Penn told the John Solomon Reports podcast.
"I don't know what they told the Harris campaign. I think the day after, suspicion here is really quite high, and I think a review of all their internal texts and emails really should be done by an independent party to find out to what extent they were planning on, in effect, you know, fact-checking just one candidate and in effect, rigging the outcome of this debate. I think the situation demands nothing less than that," he added.
obviously they did eveything they could to help her...
so it looks like Kamala’s Kommies are so far off the reservation that “their” wing of the UniParty is starting to kick and buck
who knew!
he has been raging against Ds on Twitter for a while - on Israel, on the switcheroo, on the convention and now the Ambush.
It’s a TRAP!
:)
Dang, the cartels are fighting each other.
I hope they get serious, really go to the mattresses.
Another “fix”. As Kamala is gains more and more confidence just wait…….she will revert to her nature, cackling like a hen laying an egg. In fact, i just saw Kamala at a NC rally, she started the head bobbing and cackling. In fact, it got real close to cringy Howard Dean territory. Just my opinion.
Know kamaltoe Harris out replace with......you guessed it Hitarry.
Prior to the debate I was of the understanding that there was not going to be a fact checker during the debate.
So I guess Hillary resents that all her race-pandering couldn’t get her elected because she’s white.
One certainly wonders what Penn’s angle is on this. It was so obvious and blatant... but is he trying to distance himself or get ahead of something that he knows is coming down? If so why is that... he may not be involved but he is a D. Is he just the last honest D around?
I will be releasing an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower regarding the debate. I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of the whistleblower. The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample question which were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked. Accordingly, the affidavit states several other factors that were built into the debate to give Kamala a significant advantage. I have seen and read the affidavit and after the attorney blacks out the name of the whistleblower and other information that could dox the whistleblower, I will release the full affidavit. I will be releasing the affidavit before the weekend is out.
@DocNetyoutube on X
"Former top Clinton adviser calls on ABC to launch internal probe into whether debate was rigged"
And, there is this:
Oh yeah, ABC will get right on that......
they must have internal poling showing kammy can’t close the deal. Is that the kankled one I see warming up in the background?
Libs of TikTok@libsoftiktok
So it turns out the totally unbiased ABC moderator Linsey Davis and Kamala Harris are sorority sisters!
Interesting
For ABC’s part, they overplayed their hand.
Update!
Tony Seruga
@TonySeruga
There are actually 5 whistleblowers now. Even former Clinton adviser Mark Penn is calling for ABC to probe if there was some effort at “rigging the outcome of this debate.” Additionally, a very short video is circulating of Linsey Davis who is a sorority sister of Kamala Harris, off the cuff, confirming they a]were in the same sorority on a live broadcast. She boasted that ‘relationship’ with colleagues but is now publicly saying they had never actually met but there are recent allegations from two of the whistleblowers that they have talked in private phone conversations in the past two weeks. This was discussed in an ABC News meeting regarding the debate where Dana Walden, a senior Disney executive whose portfolio includes ABC News, is one of Harris’ “extraordinary friends,”, was present virtually.
The suggestion that ABC investigate itself is nonsensical on its face. Cries of "Fox--henhouse" and "lying eyes" cliches are heard in every quarter.
This conscious deception committed by ABC TV needs expert scrutiny by a Trump-appointed committee of media-smart legal experts. And --a shot in the dark--the Republicans in Congress need to give some of these damning Debate clips some exposure on C-Span with an exhaustive witness-heavy investigation.
The main focus at present is to keep this fraudulent media crime in the public eye right thru to November.
