Tucker's guest was a faux historian, and he didn't even know the most rudimentary facts of the case he was arguing. Cooper is a fraud. The only problem is that Cooper took up space which could have been occupied by someone more interesting.
I don't watch Tucker and I know nothing about Cooper so I wouldn't know.
I'm just here because the game was afoot.
Come along, Watson. /S. H. impression
Tucker opened with saying Cooper is the best and most honest historian in America and later in the show said he believes everything he says is true.
I agree that there is no need for censorship, but I also believe we’re free to form negative opinions of these two cranks if we want to.
What did Cooper get wrong?
I have seen lots of criticism leveled against him and each and every time, they need to distort what he said in the interview (or previously) to make him appear wrong.
Whatever example you give, make sure you describe his opinion accurately.