Doesn’t IVF involve abortion in most cases?
“Selective Reduction” is the euphemism used in the context of IVF.
Trump’s non-Catholic slip is showing.
In our society, we apparently throw everything away, including pre-birth and post-birth children. Orphaned children abound and so do unused IVF embryos, all human beings but not valued as such.
I have my doubts as to this being the avenue to having an approriately-sized tax base for supporting social security. Is the number of barren couples even a dent in this endeavor? They’re still most likely to only want one or two babies at most. My mind is boggled, so I will stop now. If IVF is free, why not adoptions?
Yes.
Yes.
Depends on how you define abortion. If you have a fertilized embryo in a lab and the doctor tells you it has the wrong number of chromosomes and would never survive in the womb and you dispose of the embryo, is that an “abortion” to you?
Often. And permanently frozen embryos. Not sure if those can be sold like Planned Parenthood was selling embryo and more developed fetal bodyparts, though.