I don’t like the idea of government forcing private insurance for paying for things like this, but if the government is going to mandate them to pay, or if the federal government is going to spend tax money on IVF, it better only be for married heterosexual couples of normal child bearing age who cannot otherwise get pregnant.
This better not cover single women who want to be Moms without a husband or lesbian couples who want to start a “family.”
Agreed completely.
That is going to be the sticking point. I am against IVF for same sex or unmarried couples.I don’t think it’s fair for the kids. Threading that needle is going to be hard now that the SC has burdened America with a warped definition of marriage to pander to a small segment. There should have been an option for a committed partnership with some shared legal rights but not the coopting of marriage.
The insurance companies will be sued if they try and exclude coverage for homosexual couples.
Also: One attempted implantation per procedure. No discarding or “reducing”.