BREAKING: A Georgia judge says presidential candidates Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Claudia De la Cruz, along with the Georgia Green Party, which nominated Jill Stein, are not qualified to appear on Georgia's ballot.

They threw out everybody but Trump, Kamala, and the Libertarian. Here is an article about it: https://www.wabe.org/judge-says-4-independent-and-third-party-candidates-should-be-kept-off-georgia-presidential-ballots/

It is maddening. Judge said they had to get the required signatures for each of the 16 Presidential electors they wanted to represent them, since nobody votes for the candidate but for the electors. And Jill Stein wasn’t allowed on because she had to be on the ballots of 20 other states and the judge said that could never be proven by the deadline.

They also said that New York isn’t where RFK Jr resides, but RFK Jr explained to Tucker Carlson that New Hampshire and Maryland (?) require the candidate to register as being from the state that they vote in, which has always been NY since Kennedy keeps a residence there so he can continue to vote there where he knows the political players rather than in CA where he moved to when he married his current wife. And he can’t register using different states as his home state. So to meet the requirements for NH and MD he has to register as being from NY in all the states.

IOW, it’s all just a bunch of lawfare crap to disenfranchise anybody not voting for the dems. Sick, sick, sick.

Thank you for referencing that article Enterprise. Please note that the following critique is directed at the corrupt political parties and not at you.

"BREAKING: A Georgia judge says presidential candidates Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Claudia De la Cruz, along with the Georgia Green Party, which nominated Jill Stein, are not qualified to appear on Georgia's ballot."

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

First, note that the main reason for the electoral college is to make sure that the right person is in the wartime Oval Office.

On the other hand, the electoral college is MAJOR overkill for contacting your peacetime federal representatives to complain about the price of postage stamps and slow mail, the US Mail service one of the very few main "federal social spending services" that the states have expressly constitutionally given to the federal government, most federal domestic policy now based on state powers that the unconstitutionally big federal government has stolen from the states imo.

"Article I, Section 8, Clause 7: To establish Post Offices and post Roads;"
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
The congressional record shows that Rep. John Bingham, a constitutional lawmaker, had clarified the federal government's constitutionally limited powers versus the 10th Amendment power of the states to serve the people as follows.
”Simply this, that the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Constitution, is in the States and not in the federal government [emphases added]. I have sought to effect no change in that respect in the Constitution of the country.” —John Bingham, Congressional. Globe. 1866, page 1292 (see top half of third column)
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.

Getting back to the dos and don'ts of state electoral ballots, in stark contrast to states prohibiting political party candidate names from appearing on a state's ballot, Democratic and Republican Trump supporters are reminded of the following. The 12th Amendment (12A; electoral vote rules) reasonably indicates that electoral vote ballots are write-in ballots, the states unconstitutionally introducing limits to 12A "elector's rights" with the help of the courts imo.

Excerpted from 12A:

"The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President [emphasis added], and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice- President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;--The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;--The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; ..."

Also note that 12A goes on to indicate that when the first, and possibly last stage, which is joint session of Congress, fails to determine who the next president is, the next stage shows that the 3 top electoral vote winners from the first stage are then voted on by the House, a third candidate indicating a possible third party imo.

Originally, the Constitutional allowed for the top 5 electoral vote winners to go to the House, indicating possibly 5 political party candidates.

So I suspect that Pence and J6 Congress confirmed OBiden's challenged electoral vote as fast as they could so that voters wouldn't start asking questions about the next possible stage to determine POTUS.

The bottom line is that corrupt, political party-pirated state and federal governments have unsurprisingly politically rewritten the constitution's electoral vote rules.

The constitutionally reality is that, since worthless career federal lawmakers and renegade states have repeatedly proven that they are enemies of the people imo, it is now up to Democratic and Republican Trump supporters to effectively "impeach and remove" ALL (exceptions?) state and federal lawmakers and executives in November.

In other words, it's now up to Democratic and Republican Trump supporters to start the first major step in draining the swamp by supporting hopeful Trump 47 with a new, Constitution-respecting Congress, new state lawmakers and executives too, not only so that he will not be a lame duck president from the first day of his second term, but will support him to quickly finish draining the swamp.

Finally, let's not allow the anti-Trump media try to fade our memories of what we witnessed on July 13.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.