Yeah, that is not the kind of rant she should put on Twitter, or if she does - be prepared to get flamed. Perhaps she would be better off speaking about something like that with close friends or open-minded historians who can help her confirm or deny her facts.
I am curious though to learn more about what she is saying because she was clearly NOT saying anything bad about actual Jews, but rather that it was Frankish(?) cult members posing as Jews who were the bad guys. She was also not saying Jews didn’t die in Nazi Germany - she was saying there may have been another agenda behind the founding of Israel besides protecting Jews from the Nazis.
I also sympathize with her - or am open to hearing her thoughts on this - because I also hold extremely unpopular opinions about the Civil War that are completely misunderstood whenever I admit to them in public. I am treated as if I’m defending slavery - which I’m not - or as if I am denying there was slavery in the South - which I’m not.
I have a saying; “The fake news of today becomes the fake history of tomorrow” or conversely “The fake news of yesterday becomes the fake history of today”
The point being that the people who control what gets reported as news are the very same people who get to control what gets recorded as history.
Just observing in my lifetime how profoundly untruthful the reporters of “news” have been regarding events that I have witnessed with my own eyes - I can know it is all a pack of lies. So, why should anyone expect “history” to be any more honest?
That is why when someone like Candice Owens questions the orthodox version of “history”, and gets called a heretic, a denier or a conspiracy theorist - I am open to listening.