Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: AnotherUnixGeek

I think it would be worth a shot in court arguing the “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” clause of the 14A could be reasonably argued that a born child of non-citizens cannot be interpreted as being a person subject to the jurisdiction of the US government.


7 posted on 08/05/2024 9:49:16 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Sgt_Schultze

Good point, I think that’s a good direction in which to move.


9 posted on 08/05/2024 9:51:09 AM PDT by River Hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Sgt_Schultze
a born child of non-citizens cannot be interpreted as being a person subject to the jurisdiction of the US government.

To the jurisdiction of what government is that child subject? What does it mean to be subject to the jurisdiction of a government?

An illegal alien, or a child born within the borders of these United States to illegal aliens, who commits a crime within the borders of these United States will theoretically face trial for that crime in a United States or State court. The trial will be conducted according to United States and State law. Does that make the illegal alien or child thereof subject to the jurisdiction of these United States?

21 posted on 08/05/2024 10:22:42 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson