Good Luck Denying This One, Kamala; VP Argues Person Committing Crime 'Is Not a Criminal'

Western Journal ^ | 27 July 2024 | Samuel Short

[Sam77]

Vice President Kamala Harris’ past is going to thoroughly haunt her up to November’s General Election should she officially secure the Democratic Party’s nomination for the presidency.

While her campaign team would desperately like you to see her as the preferable alternative to former President Donald Trump, there is simply too much evidence to the contrary floating around the internet.

---

TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS:

[xp38]

She might be like Whoopie. It’s not crime crime like it’s not rape rape.

[Libloather]

Horizontal took chicom bribes? Here we go again...

[alloysteel]

Person Committing Crime 'Is Not a Criminal'

The word salad got thoroughly commingled with that phrase.

[SMARTY]

‘Person Committing Crime ‘Is Not a Criminal’ ?? Hhhuuuuhhh....?

No one BUT a criminal could think that or SAY it

[rlmorel]

This is not an unusual mindset for Leftists. A lot of them believe that humans are intrinsically good, and society makes them bad.

Rousseau's "Noble Savage", where people living naked, in a state of grace, unencumbered by intereractions with other humans, is as close to Utopia as humans can get. (They don't believe in God, so this is probably their substitute for The Garden of Eden)

And since they don't believe in God, they don't believe that humans have evil inside of us, all of us, and that it is a constant battle to suppress it, and deal with people who won't suppress it.

They subscribe to the "PID" theory, that bad things only happen because of Poverty, Ignorance, and Disease. In their minds, if you eliminate those things, everything will be hunky dory.

In summary, nothing humans do is their fault. It is someone else's fault. A total abdication of personal responsibility. Leftism is a childish, ultimately authoritarian, and dangerous ideology. It is evil incarnate.

Whittaker Chambers described it best in his book "Witness":

“It [Communism] is not new. It is, in fact, man's second oldest faith. Its promise was whispered in the first days of the Creation under the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil: "Ye shall be as gods." It is the great alternative faith of mankind. Like all great faiths, its force derives from a simple vision. Other ages have had great visions. They have always been different versions of the same vision: the vision of God and man's relationship to God. The Communist vision is the vision of Man without God.

It is the vision of man's mind displacing God as the creative intelligence of the world. It is the vision of man's liberated mind, by the sole force of its rational intelligence, redirecting man's destiny and reorganizing man's life and the world. It is the vision of man, once more the central figure of the Creation, not because God made man in his image, but because man's mind makes him the most intelligent of the animals. Copernicus and his successors displaced man as the central fact of the universe by proving that the earth was not the central star of the universe. Communism restores man to his sovereignty by the simple method of denying God.”

[230FMJ]

bfl

[plain talk]

“A lot of them believe that humans are intrinsically good, and society makes them bad.”

That’s essentially what they say. But then they lie a lot.

I don’t think they really believe it so much but say it to get votes.

[Dr. Sivana]

Her line was that “an undocumented immigrant is not a criminal”. Sometimes, the line is technically correct. Those who are trafficked minor children taken across, etc. are examples. So, the say the same thing with qualifiers if need be. Donald Trump often lists types of people who routinely flood our borders. He gets flack for it, but no one can question that rapists and drug dealers and hardened criminals cross our borders illegally.

[9YearLurker]

No, merely a “person of crime”.

[knarf]

[whitney69]

“‘Person Committing Crime ‘Is Not a Criminal’”

It’s word giberish. A person can’t commit a crime until they are seen and charged. Until then they are suspects, not criminals, at worst. If you think like a cork screw person you might be an attorney. So in this thinking everyone that can get past the defenses of Homeland Security and are not seen or caught, they are not committing a crime. And until someone sees them, they are not even suspects. Word giberish.

wy69

[Liz]

Liberals “say” these senseless, gross falsities
b/c it makes them “feel good” about themselves.

[rlmorel]

Of course, that is true. You can divide Leftists into three groups:

• The Ones Who Understand Fully: These would be the likes of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. They know full well the end goal of Leftism is tyranny and subjugation for everyone else, and for inner party members like them, freedom, wealth, and power. These people, on the basis of what they stand for, are incorrigible and unapproachable. These people NEVER change.
  
  
• The True Believers: These are the people who actually believe in all the pap put out by The Ones Who Understand Fully. These are politicians, media personalities, entertainment celebrities, and citizens who buy fully into that. These are also people who cannot be reasoned with, and are known for their bug-eyed, red-faced, spittle-lipped tirades in support of their tyrannical ideology. Oddly, these people are the same ones described in Solhenitsyn's "The Gulag Archipelago" that were taken away in chains by Stalin's state organs and thrown into Stalin's Gulags, who shed tears for Stalin when he died. They are also the ones who scream, as they are dragged away, "Why are you doing this to me? I believe in the principles of the Party! I'm one of you!" People from this group can become, on rare occasions, if not conservatives, at least enemies of the tyranny they once supported. David Horowitz is one of these who escaped.
  
  
• And of course, The Useful Idiots: These people support The True Believers and the Ones Who Understand Fully, usually out of ignorance. They have no idea. They are the ones who subscribe to things like Affirmative Action and woke ideology. They support government run health care. They believe in limits on people's rights "for the good of the majority". The support taxing wealthier people because they ostensibly don't pay their fair share. Often, these people can change and eventually become conservative when they raise families, earn a living, and pay taxes.

At least that is how I divide them up.

[rlmorel]

And Kamala Harris is a fusion of the first group and the second group. She isn’t fully intelligent enough to be in the first group, and is too grounded in what can be accomplished as a woman intent on the acquisition of power to be fully invested in the second group.

[SaxxonWoods]

So, Trump is off the hook?

[Vaduz]

She read the first page in the democrat manual.

[paudio]

If PID is true, how did Khieu Shampan that held doctorate from University of Paris create a genocide in Cambodia? And don’t forget that Atta et al were not poor or uneducated...

[Lisbon1940]

The only thing preferable are the charges that should be brought against her.

[Sequoyah101]

The media full court press blitz for harris and against trump will easily put the communists in cheat to steal range. The only hope I see is over exposure because the woman wears thin quickly on even people who might be for her on impulse. She is reprehensible and disgusting to me on first glance and the hearing nails it even without accurate knowledge of her thoughts.