Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Reno89519

Isn’t this against medical ethics and medical practice for him to diagnose a patient he hasn’t even seen?


16 posted on 07/10/2024 3:22:36 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway
There was some discussion on that that I read yesterday.

From ChatGPT: The Goldwater Rule is a guideline set forth by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) which prohibits psychiatrists from offering professional opinions about public figures they have not personally examined and whose consent they have not obtained to discuss their mental health. This rule was established in response to the 1964 presidential election when Fact magazine published a survey of psychiatrists who speculated on the mental health of candidate Barry Goldwater without having evaluated him personally. The Goldwater Rule is intended to uphold ethical standards and maintain public trust in the psychiatric profession by avoiding potentially harmful and unsubstantiated public commentary on individuals' mental health.

While the Goldwater Rule establishes a professional and ethical guideline for psychiatrists, it is not a legal mandate. This means that while psychiatrists are strongly advised by their professional association (the APA) to adhere to this rule, they cannot be legally punished by the state for breaking it.

22 posted on 07/10/2024 3:26:21 PM PDT by Reno89519 (I'll go out on a limb: Trump & Gabbard 2024 or Trump & Sanders 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson