Replies

Look at your posting history. Either you’re stalking or have a weird obsession. Or both. Either way, you’re officially notified to engage me with substantive information that challenges what I post . I’m more than happy to be proven wrong or learn information. But the relentless responses that are nothing more than ‘I don’t want to read it so ban this $sshat’ is beyond getting old. And that goes for the posse which you’re affiliated has gotten old. In addition stop “talking behind my back” either on the forum and in private messages.

Engage in civil conversation/discussion/debate all day & night.

Look at your posting history. Either you’re stalking or have a weird obsession. Or both. Either way, you’re officially notified to engage me with substantive information that challenges what I post . I’m more than happy to be proven wrong or learn information. But the relentless responses that are nothing more than ‘I don’t want to read it so ban this $sshat’ is beyond getting old. And that goes for the posse which you’re affiliated has gotten old. In addition stop “talking behind my back” either on the forum and in private messages.

See, here's the issue with that.

Your tendency over the years has been to attack many effective conservatives, and to join in leftist attacks on America's best and final hope, Donald Trump.

You've asserted and stood by the claim that Trump received a fair trial:

Despite the fact that he was tried in a very hostile region by a very hostile prosecutor and backed by a very hostile Biden administration official, and overseen by a very hostile judge.
Despite the fact he was tried for a crime he never even participated in, in ANY way....and was held accountable for a subordinate making a journal entry in a ledger that New York took issue with
Despite the fact that the jury instruction was utterly in opposition to SCOTUS rulings, that all elements of a prosecution must be agreed up completely before a guilty verdict is read out
Despite the fact that the predicate crimes (that were supposedly why New York alleged fraud in pursuit of those crimes) yet these predicate crimes where not even accused, much less proven... and yet the jury was allowed to assume the predicate crimes were true.

Further, you not only assert Trump had a fair trial, but you even claim he was treated with kid gloves.

Based on that, alone, it is clear you hail from a different planet and possess a worldview in complete opposition to both widely-established legal principles, as well as the nearly universally-held views of most of our forum members.

Why would we want to 'debate' someone like that? It would be akin to trying to argue mathematics with someone who asserted that 1 equals 0, and that division by zero is an acceptable mathematic action.

Just not realistic. Thus, we want people like that gone. Liberal lunacy is not welcome here.

(I am leaving aside your assertion that voter fraud was insufficient to steal the election from Trump in 2020, and your resistance to the objective concept that the NY trial was the first successful prosecution in American history in which clearly-political prosecutions were heaped upon a leading presidential candidate, as happens in South America or the former Soviet Union. I am sticking with the most egregious of your claims, only.)

And that goes for the posse which you’re affiliated has gotten old. In addition stop “talking behind my back” either on the forum and in private messages.

Lookit the Democrat Party operative get all cheesed off that REAL freepers don't like him vomiting his Nicolle Wallace-Joe Scarborough PMSNBC Talking Points all over the forum.

=============

To: kiryandil
Sarah Palin was an effective conservative?

Reagan was an effective conservative. There is no comparison between Sarah and Reagan.

67 posted on 6/18/2024, 4:33:47 AM by joesbucks

=============

Back in 2010, 14 years ago, equating Sarah Palin with that Commie pile of dogsqueeze ZeroBama:

I’m afraid* of Sarah Palin for the same reasons I was afraid of Obama. 

Neither are the type of person I want leading the country and their results, 
while comimg from polar opposites of the political spectrum would largely be the same.

*If afraid is defined as concerned for the outcome for the country, then yes, I’m afraid.

9 posted on 7/11/2010, 12:38:56 PM by joesbucks

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2550618/posts?page=9#9

Ahhh...so it is actually YOU who is stalking me.

Civil conversation is the LAST thing you are interested in here. You aren’t interested in “learning” a darn thing. You made this clear for a very long time and it’s time for you to be expunged.

At this point, my role here is to continue to call you out for the fraud and troll you are. Get used to it. You serve zero purpose on this site and I am sick and tired of trolls like you.