If they can’t answer the basic biology question about what a woman is or what is a man then they are not qualified to do anything. Not even run a lemonade stand.
Any 3rd grader can answer these simple questions. Any child who knows the difference in their pee pee parts can answer these questions.
It’s not complicated or nuanced. It just is. Disqualified. Next!
I wouldn’t be surprised if a few Republican senators vote to confirm Sarah Netburn.
Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and Mitt Romney voted to confirm Ketanji Brown Jackson for the Supreme Court.
I understand her confusion. I’m not sure whether that is a man or a woman. She looks like Weird Al Yankovic.
Actually, I’m fine with this, as long as these nominees pledge to recuse themselves from any cases that involve equal pay for women, equal opportunities for women, set-asides for women-owned businesses, etc - after all, if they don’t know what the hell they’re dealing with, how can they deal with it?
So...these morons cannot
1. Add 2+2 - because they are not mathematicians
2. Tell if it is raining - because they are not meteorologists
3. Cook dinner - because they are not chefs
4. Make their beds - because they are not maids
...and so forth, ad infinitum
Shows how derelict, incorrigible, and insane Demonrats are.
“I have never studied biology, and therefore I am unqualified to answer this question.”
Is the Earth flat?
I’m not a geologist.
Is it hot in the summer and cold in the winter?
I’m not a thermodynamicist.
Fetal alcohol syndrome?
THAT’s A MAN, BABY!!
so they are confirming that it is a question of biology
and they cannot answer a basic biology question that any child knows
they are not qualified to sit on the bench
Biology used to be taught in government controlled public schools.
You’d think lawyers and judges would want to understand common sense but obviously not based on the Trump trial.
Gender is common sense to most except the left. I’d hate to think I made it to law school and didn’t know the difference between a man and a woman.
They need to check all her transcripts. If she had one biology class, she lied under oath. She did not use the weasel words I am not a biologist. She stated she never studied it.
"She was asked if chromosomes determine s*x and she said she can’t answer because she “never studied biology.”"
The problem with nominee Judge Sarah Netburn's politically correct, pro-LGBT reply is that it shows that she probably doesn't know (blatantly ignores?) Supreme Court case precedent any more than she knows biology.
More specifically, Netburn wrongly ignores the case precedent, established in Minor v. Happersett, that sex is determined by biological sex at birth.
After all, the Supreme Court did not recommend that Virginia Minor simply claim to be a man in order to be able to vote.
Note that Virginia Minor's fight for women's suffrage led to the ratification of the sex-based 19th Amendment voting rights protection.
"19th Amendment: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
Since the very corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification Congress is protecting OBiden who nominates people like Netburn, it's up to Democratic and Republican Trump supporters to support hopeful Trump 47 with a new patriot Congress in November, not only so that he won't be a lame duck president from the first day of his second term, but will also support Trump to quickly finish draining the swamp.
Possibilities:
1) She's lying, and therefore unfit for any judicial position.
2) She's a complete moron, and therefore unfit for any judicial position.
3) ???
Anyone too frightened to deviate even in the slightest manner from the current orthodoxy should be summarily rejected without further discussion.