Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul R.

They can call it “free range” even when they are confined in large buildings and never set foot on grass, I believe.
Still better than being stuck in cramped cages unable to move, but not the sunny green flowery meadows with interesting grasshoppers and June beetles to chase that people picture when they hear “free range.”


34 posted on 05/30/2024 8:33:27 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: piasa
I thought that was the "cage free" category. But with marketing people, I can see it getting pushed. "Ranging" inside the building? Huh. But the AI preview from the Brave Browser says:

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) defines "free range" as animals having continuous access to the outdoors for more than 51% of their lives, and not being confined or feedlot-raised for any portion of their lives. However, the term doesn't specify how much space per animal is required, how often they should have access to the outdoors, or the quality of the land. For example, a free-range chicken might live in a large shed with a small outdoor space that it shares with thousands of other birds.

It may also be that a lot of chicks were fried... :-(

Granted, that evokes memories of certain young (or even not quite so young) ladies back in my 20's and 30's. It was a good idea to maintain a certain distance from them. :-)

Which in turn recalls my observation at one time that "As the Beatles turned to psychedelic drugs, a lot of chicks got fried".

38 posted on 05/31/2024 1:08:22 AM PDT by Paul R. (Bin Laden wanted Obama killed so the incompetent VP, Biden, would become President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson