think the immumity case may address this as well. As Trump “supposedly” performed his “criminal” acts while President, if the SC rules he has immunity, then wouldn’t that overturn the conviction?
****************************
Uh, I think there’s a little problem with your theory. In no possible way could Trump’s business book keeping be considered official presidential acts, so not covered by immunity.
It would immunize him for something he was NOT doing in his business so he could BE President. Further proof that this is all fabrication for a purpose— and... invalid. Immunity encompasses more than just Presidential acts.. it involves the intrusion of the non-Presidential worlds actions.