Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Nervous Tick

>Unless there is a federal law issue, the SCOTUS has no say.

Repeated constitutional violations are good enough


259 posted on 05/30/2024 3:01:07 PM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]


To: struggle; Nervous Tick

“>Unless there is a federal law issue, the SCOTUS has no say.”

They used Federal Election campaign law as a predicate crime. That makes it a federal issue.

It is also an obvious case of a CITY trying to interfere with a federal election - and consider this: It is a crime he is accused of doing while President. How much immunity does a President have? THAT case is currently being examined!

PS: Not a lawyer. Just an EXTREMELY pissed off person.

And seriously...I’m very law abiding, but if Democrats want to ignore the law, there are people in this world who would be willing to break laws I would not! That is the genius of democracy: PEACEFUL resolution of difference by voting freely. But what happens when one side refuses to allow a free vote?

I am not advocating violence, but I am observing what has happened repeatedly thru human history: If there is no peaceful means of resolving differences, then...

So yes, I’m afraid of what is about to happen!


275 posted on 05/30/2024 3:07:37 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson