[G Larry]

The declaration that the jury need not unanimously agree on a verdict is invalid on its face. He is inventing judicial process that does not exist under the law or the Constitution.

[workerbee]

He is inventing judicial process that does not exist under the law or the Constitution.

So what? Nobody's going to stop him. He knows it and we know it.

[cuz1961]

The declaration that the jury need not unanimously agree on a verdict is invalid on its face. He is inventing judicial process that does not exist under the law or the Constitution.

\/

no no no

our very own aristocrat and

Esquire

( the narrativecontrolcubicle )

says its all above board

/$s