Liberalism requires being able to accept two opposing premises as true simultaneously. She was defending men’s rights to be women which is completely antithetical to the rights of women to be women, yet she was also considered to be a women’s rights advocate protecting women’s rights. Good liberal!
You are so correct. Whenever I hear a media commentator say “they can’t have it both ways“ I think to myself …. Dems do have it both ways often. Dems can say completely opposite things and will still be defended by the propaganda press.
As a test of logic, they cannot have it both ways but in reality, dems have it both ways whenever they want.