OK, so your example is the homo/pervert coalition as standing for the premise that they are driven by radical secularism.
Admittedly, they articulate a secularist narrative, i.e. that “there is nothing wrong with homo/perversion, its just another lifestyle choice.”
But it is obvious and incontestable that homo/perversion is not natural or sustainable and is, in addition to being immoral - a mental illness. Most homo/perverts know this. they just say lifestyle choice due to the social stigma associated with their filthy and disgusting habits.
But, giving muslims credit for their opposition to the homo/pervert behaviors is like thanking a robber for stealing some drug dealers drugs.
Yet it will still result in the destruction of society. See what happened to the Romans of antiquity.
But, giving muslims credit for their opposition to the homo/pervert behaviors is like thanking a robber for stealing some drug dealers drugs.
This seems to be a criticism angled from the wrong species, as the Islamic opposition to LGBTQ+ is rooted in a transcendent moral order (allegedly, as the god they profess to worship is a false one).
It is precisely because liberal secularism has hollowed out the ethics and religion of Christianity in the West that Islam has even been able to take root at all, because Christians are verboten by the secular social order from even opposing Islam on theological, moral, or even rational grounds at all (because of 'muh racism' and 'muh oppression').
As far as fundamental worldviews are concerned, Islam does not concern me nearly as much, because they can be opposed on the same playing field.
Liberal secularism, however, is a foundation which poisons the soul and reduces religion to nonsense in the eyes of the culture.