Posted on 05/13/2024 2:29:43 PM PDT by DFG
A leading climate scientist has suggested a virulent pandemic killing swathes of the human population is the only way to reduce carbon emissions enough to halt climate change. Professor Bill McGuire was previously a member of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), a British government body that advised politicians on the Covid pandemic response. He also helped author a report for the notorious Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a United Nations (UN) body that has helped drive climate policy globally despite making a slew of errors.
“If I am brutally honest, the only realistic way I see emissions falling as fast as they need to, to avoid catastrophic #climate breakdown, is the culling of the human population by a pandemic with a very high fatality rate,” wrote McGuire, Professor of Geophysical & Climate Hazards at University College London (UCL).
(Excerpt) Read more at thenationalpulse.com ...
Do yourself a favor.
Go back to the top of the thread.
Read every comment.
Take note of who posted each comment.
If you’re still confused, ask me again.
But first, read every post and take not of who posted each comment.
I did read the thread......not following what you’re trying to get at.
Did you read #17?
Did you notice who wrote it?
What do you think it means?
With your line of questioning I really have no idea what you’re getting at.
Really?
Fascinating.
It appears that you think I'm OK with the deliberate slaughter of more than 7,500,000,000 people, just to comply with the weird eco-freak principles laid out in the (now destroyed) Georgia Guidestones.
But I don't think you really believe that of me.
I think you're being deliberately obtuse, because I pointed out a bit of hypocrisy in your post #30.
I have no contradicting statements on this thread so I really don't see what you call hypocrisy on my part.
The professor made a statement he believed in. Agree??
He got called on it by a number of folks....agree?
He then tried to downplay it....agree??
One of his peers called him out on saying it....not because I think he disagrees with it but because it harms their true line of thinking......is that clear enough to you?
not because I think he disagrees with it but because it harms their true line of thinking
So in your opinion it doesn't matter what they actually do ... right or wrong they're bad.
Like I said, it's hypocritical of you ... and, like this idiot's colleagues called him out, I'm calling you out. And you don't like it. And you still show no understanding of my post #17 ... if you even read it.
You can do better.
Bro....this professor is wrong for what he's advanced.
Do you in any way think this guy is good??
If you think he's a small minority get a cup of coffee.
You've called me out?? That's comical. I've said nothing I'll apologize for or have to apologize for.
I read your #17....and??
But I see I'm the only one you seem to be questioning even though others made comments before me.
You are the one who needs to do better.
Of course not. That doesn't mean you're right.
Calling people "idiots" when they do the right thing (call out a colleague for being a genocidal maniac) is idiotic.
Do better.
His colleagues support this nonsense. They’re upset he posted publicly what is held by many of our so called betters. And that is what makes them idiots. That should be pretty simple to follow.
Ahhh ... I see.
You’re a mind reader.
You should have told me earlier.
Dude, give it up. You keep standing up for academia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.