metmom : "If the batches were variable in their harm, then it was deliberate.
Otherwise, how would they know if something in manufacture caused it?
And if they knew that and released them anyways, it’s still deliberate.
But since they knew it at the time, then there’s no question it was deliberate."
(From the article): ”There's been another internal email leak from a Pfizer ‘whistleblower’ to top off the testimony from Pfizer reps to Senator Malcolm Roberts at a recent Senate hearing in Australia.
I tend to be more persuaded by the latter, but confirmations are always valuable.
Click on the photo below to hear the Pfizer reps admit to this, and interestingly, what they say is almost verbatim what is written in the ‘internal email’. “
”Pfizer undertook to import a batch of vaccines specifically for the employee vaccination program.
Theroux and Hewitt - Pfizer reps. (Forgive me if the names are mis-spelled.) “
”Here’s a screenshot of the ‘Whistleblower’ email.(in the article)
Source:
https://slaynews.com/news/pfizer-whistleblower-leaks-email-separate-covid-shots-employees/. “
”The vaccine doses to be used for this program are separate and distinct from those committed by Pfizer to governments around the world
and will not impact supply to national governments in any way. Pfizer ‘Whistleblower’ ...”
Separate shots for 'employees'.
This necessarily means one of two things: that there were batches that were less harmful than others, or that there were known placebo batches (saline injections - and I mean, true saline injections that would be harmless). “
If the former is true, that there is known variation between batches (whatever this means), then the batches were designed this way.
If THIS is true, then we have intent on our hands.
I still have trouble imagining that they would be capable of varying at will or by demand in a way that would ever be predictably variably harmful. “
(My Opinion) : This probably explains why Jacinda Ardern, former Prime Minister of New Zealand (2017–2023), and an active agent of the World Economic Forum (WEF), retired suddenly
after a government agent detected different responses to different batches of the covid vaxxine in the limited numbers of the New Zealand population.
The day the whistle-blower released his data, he was immediately arrested,
and Jacinda Arden threatened anyone who released his data with incarceration, even though she was no longer in office.
The location and disposition of that whistle-blower, who demonstrated different effects of different batches of vaxxine remains unknown at this time
How is this not a crime against humanity with different batches having different effects, including injury, adverse effects, or death ?..which negates all civil indemnity ?
How is this batch differences, NOT A CRIMINAL FRAUD ?
The entire vax crime from the beginning was (and continues to be) a diabolical plan to kill and maim as many as possible, while making $$$. Crimes against humanity, need Nuremberg type trials, and then executions.