To: ProtectOurFreedom
Trumps lawyers sat their enthralled by her tale. Didn’t object once. Because of trump’s lawyers incompetence, I’d reject a mistrial myself.
33 posted on
05/09/2024 1:16:18 PM PDT by
napscoordinator
(DeSantis is a beast! Florida is the freest state in the country! )
To: napscoordinator
You’re typing this one-handed while you’re re-watching Spermy Daniels’ testimony for the 15th time...
36 posted on
05/09/2024 1:18:47 PM PDT by
kiryandil
(FR Democrat Party operatives! Rally in defense of your Colombian cartel stooge Merchan!)
To: napscoordinator
Trumps lawyers sat their enthralled by her tale. Didn’t object once. Because of trump’s lawyers incompetence, I’d reject a mistrial myself.
They objected to all of it - on several grounds and on several aspects - and were overruled, and objected to many details of it. They were specific as to the type of objectionable things that Daniels was likely to say. They objected and got the judge to declare ‘guardrails’ in instructions to the prosecution, on the testimony, which were generally not enforced.
40 posted on
05/09/2024 1:24:04 PM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: napscoordinator
There has to be a strategic reason Trump’s lawyers did not object. The judge chided them for NOT objecting. It’s all too weird.
49 posted on
05/09/2024 2:58:06 PM PDT by
ProtectOurFreedom
(“When exposing a crime is treated like a crime, you are being ruled by criminals” – Edward Snowden)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson