Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Biden’s Solicitor General’s “obstruction” argument to the court seemed to serve a dual purpose:
<><>to placate the court’s concerns that the govt’s reading of Section 1512(c)(2) is overbroad
<><>and to convince the justices that the DOJ applies the obstruction statute “uniformly.”


Yet, judging by the questions and responses from the bench,
from Gorsuch, a majority of the justices remained unconvinced.

Far from establishing that the Biden DOJ enforces Section 1512(c)(2) uniformly,
<><>his solicitor general’s argument painted a far different picture
<><>that the Biden admin acted solely in its own interests
<><>that it enlarged or contracted statutory language at will
<><>altering the law in obeisance to leftists’ self-serving political purposes of the moment.


8 posted on 04/18/2024 4:15:10 AM PDT by Liz (This then is how we should pray: Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Liz

The guy who set off the fire alarm? He should be expelled-first order of business in the new congress, just like Santos.

Add an “I don’t give a damn if you’re black.”


9 posted on 04/18/2024 5:36:47 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson